Page 1 of 2
no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 7:24 pm
by Roccgroh
yes it me again, not 1 Liberty playr on the list for 2011
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/2011-nfl ... -prospects
no playrr on 2010 list
http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... -prospects
this show that rocco cant coach but he don't send playrs to the the NFL if he do this then why is no Liberty on here? keep makeing excuse for rocco and the asst coachs,NOT 1 LIBERTY NAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 7:43 pm
by SuperJon
Go ahead and tell me Matt Bevins isn't going to get a shot at the NFL after next year.
Tell me Chris Summers isn't going to get a look.
Tell me Mike Brown isn't going to get a look.
Tell me Asa Chapman isn't going to get a look.
If you think those four are not going to be pro prospects then you are a ruhtard.
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 7:53 pm
by jenkins
im getting tired of seeing another ridiculous post everyday and it's starting to clutter up the board.
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 8:00 pm
by Roccgroh
tell the writer who write not me,why no liberty player on 2010 2011
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 8:01 pm
by jenkins
go back and check this list after the year and see if it's the same..or even close.
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 8:14 pm
by olldflame
Name the FCS schools that send players to the NFL every year. It's a really short list.
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 8:16 pm
by Roccgroh
chris sumers the only 1 who will make it, mike brown is good, but to slow and small, asa has size but never in shape so he wont, but why no talk of no liberty playrs on both list put up???????????
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 8:17 pm
by From the class of 09
Roccgroh wrote:chris sumers the only 1 who will make it, mike brown is good, but to slow and small, asa has size but never in shape so he wont, but why no talk of no liberty playrs on both list put up???????????
who cares?
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 8:18 pm
by aredd33
Most of the people on the list are listed at 6th round to UNDRAFTED.
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 8:20 pm
by LUnpretty11
Can we please take down this ridiculous topic? I second what Jenkins said on this one.
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 8:23 pm
by olldflame
There are 126 FCS programs. Only 16 are on that list. I guess all of the other 110 schools need to get new coaches?.

Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 8:35 pm
by Roccgroh
i see richmond, james madiosn, hello!!!!!!!!!!
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 8:40 pm
by jbock13
Roccgroh wrote:i see richmond, james madiosn, hello!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah, and Liberty has always been on the same level as them...
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 8:47 pm
by olldflame
Oh, and looks like Richmond recruits in Connecticut and Louisiana. That's where the only 2 players actually picked to go in the top 5 rounds are from.
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 8:51 pm
by LUminary
Not sure how great that list is. Couple of the names are wrong. Szczur (No.3 on the list) took the big bonus to give up football and play for the Chicago Cubs.
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 8th, 2011, 11:13 pm
by prototype
What happens if everyone on the board foe's roccgroh?
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 9th, 2011, 12:44 am
by El Scorcho
olldflame wrote:There are 126 FCS programs. Only 16 are on that list. I guess all of the other 110 schools need to get new coaches?. 
This.
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 9th, 2011, 12:45 am
by El Scorcho
Also: We don't pay Rocco to send players to the pros. We're not a farm team. We pay him to win at Liberty. There's a difference. (See: Coach K)
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 9th, 2011, 3:32 am
by WinterIsComing
SuperJon wrote:Go ahead and tell me Matt Bevins isn't going to get a shot at the NFL after next year.
I'm no RG fan, but...
If Bevins actually starts making field goals like in 2009, sure, he'll get a shot. But not for long if he can only make 74% of his kicks in a tryout against such "talent" as Shaun "Wide Left" Suisham who makes almost 81% of his kicks. Hopefully he has shorter memory of his 2010 performance than mine.
2010
FIELD GOALS Made-Att Pct 01-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-99 Long Blkd
BEVINS, Matt 20-27 74.1 1-1 10-10 4-6 3-5 2-5 52 2
2009
FIELD GOALS Made-Att Pct 01-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-99 Long Blkd
BEVINS, Matt 22-26 84.6 0-0 5-7 10-10 6-8 1-1 50 2
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 9th, 2011, 11:09 am
by SuperJon
Look at his numbers in the last 7 games of the season. He was still a 1st team All-American. Once he got things fixed and wasn't constantly trying 45+ yarders he started drilling them consistently.
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 9th, 2011, 12:22 pm
by olldflame
If you make all-america because your coach doesn't trust you to try anything over 40 and you make a bunch of chip shots, I would say it doesn't mean much. When you are making them from 45 and even 50 plus, it does.
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 11th, 2011, 3:50 pm
by sheppard
All of these players would be in the 2012 draft not 2011
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 11th, 2011, 4:15 pm
by olldflame
If you are referring to the LU players, nobody said 2011. They said "next year".
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 11th, 2011, 6:12 pm
by sheppard
the start of this blog says 2011 , scoll up player
Re: no liberty prospect for pro
Posted: February 11th, 2011, 7:39 pm
by jbock13
who really cares, this whole thread is irrelevant.