Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke, Class of 20Something
Old School wrote:I think it will be the one that Coach Rocco thinks can lead the team the best this year. Personally, I trust his judgement.Cop out. Pick one.
Rooster Cogburn wrote:Seriously. I will trust Coach no matter who he decides, but come on.Old School wrote:I think it will be the one that Coach Rocco thinks can lead the team the best this year. Personally, I trust his judgement.Cop out. Pick one.
El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.
LUconn wrote:I said Landis but that's totally based on the situation at the end of last season. I haven't followed practice to know if any of the other QBs have made a progression to take the job. I also think Beecher was brought in to compete for the job. But that doesn't mean he'll get it.Mike Brown had beaten him out by the spring game, and since Spencer's got two years on Mike in development I can't see Spencer beating Mike out during the summer.
El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.
TylerBakersGonnaBGreat wrote:I voted other: Tyler Baker.lololool
SuperJon wrote:It's likely that Tommy Beecher would've come to Liberty even if football wasn't an option.Fair observation since you've probably met him by now and I haven't. I hope he did come to LU because he wanted to be at LU. But I still bet he wants to play and expects too.
Rocketfan wrote:To me Game 1 it doesn't matter who the starter is at all. I say that because against WVU at least 2 guys are going to get into that game so Rocco and staff can evaulate the talent.First, why on earth would Rocco wait until WVU to evaluate the talent? That's what training camp is for. If the coaches don't know by gameday who can do what, we have serious issues outside of just who our starter at QB is. Secondly, even if we did wait until then, WVU is hardly the opponent you want to determine that against.



RagingTireFire wrote:What im saying is its quite possible both bring different things to the game, plus we have a whole new staff this year and have tweaked our offense from previous years. Evaluting your talent vs. your own team and then vs. WVU two different scales in my opinion.Rocketfan wrote:To me Game 1 it doesn't matter who the starter is at all. I say that because against WVU at least 2 guys are going to get into that game so Rocco and staff can evaulate the talent.First, why on earth would Rocco wait until WVU to evaluate the talent? That's what training camp is for. If the coaches don't know by gameday who can do what, we have serious issues outside of just who our starter at QB is. Secondly, even if we did wait until then, WVU is hardly the opponent you want to determine that against.
That said, if the game gets out of hand in either direction -- hey, I can hope -- I would also expect to see multiple QB's as well as substitution at other positions just to get some guys some live game minutes.
Rocketfan wrote:I voted Beecher. A coach wants the most weapons on the field as possible at any given time. Brown's flexibility as a WR or even at RB for a few plays allows Beecher to get on the field at the same time. Aside from WVU's, that's a pretty scary scenario for any D-Coordinator on LU's schedule.RagingTireFire wrote:What im saying is its quite possible both bring different things to the game, plus we have a whole new staff this year and have tweaked our offense from previous years. Evaluting your talent vs. your own team and then vs. WVU two different scales in my opinion.Rocketfan wrote:To me Game 1 it doesn't matter who the starter is at all. I say that because against WVU at least 2 guys are going to get into that game so Rocco and staff can evaulate the talent.First, why on earth would Rocco wait until WVU to evaluate the talent? That's what training camp is for. If the coaches don't know by gameday who can do what, we have serious issues outside of just who our starter at QB is. Secondly, even if we did wait until then, WVU is hardly the opponent you want to determine that against.
That said, if the game gets out of hand in either direction -- hey, I can hope -- I would also expect to see multiple QB's as well as substitution at other positions just to get some guys some live game minutes.
Rocketfan wrote:Point taken.RagingTireFire wrote:What im saying is its quite possible both bring different things to the game, plus we have a whole new staff this year and have tweaked our offense from previous years. Evaluting your talent vs. your own team and then vs. WVU two different scales in my opinion.Rocketfan wrote:To me Game 1 it doesn't matter who the starter is at all. I say that because against WVU at least 2 guys are going to get into that game so Rocco and staff can evaulate the talent.First, why on earth would Rocco wait until WVU to evaluate the talent? That's what training camp is for. If the coaches don't know by gameday who can do what, we have serious issues outside of just who our starter at QB is. Secondly, even if we did wait until then, WVU is hardly the opponent you want to determine that against.
That said, if the game gets out of hand in either direction -- hey, I can hope -- I would also expect to see multiple QB's as well as substitution at other positions just to get some guys some live game minutes.

Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.