

Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke, Class of 20Something
LUconn wrote:I was hoping the logo in the middle wasn't gonna have the white background. It helps it stand out more but I like it better without it.We had the same logo w/o the white background on the field last year and you couldn't see it. The logo ended up looking like a big red and blue smudge in the middle of the field. The white gives it some much-needed definition.
Libertine wrote:I remember. I thought that might be due to the type of turf it was and it being worn down quickly. I figured this turf would hold it's color/definition. With green as a background, it does tend to lose it's pop, but I just like the way the logo looks on the walls in demoss (which might not be the way they are if the wall wasn't already white) rather than a white outline.LUconn wrote:I was hoping the logo in the middle wasn't gonna have the white background. It helps it stand out more but I like it better without it.We had the same logo w/o the white background on the field last year and you couldn't see it. The logo ended up looking like a big red and blue smudge in the middle of the field. The white gives it some much-needed definition.