flamerbob wrote:they are Big South refsAre they not using the same rule book?
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke, Class of 20Something
flamerbob wrote:they are Big South refsAre they not using the same rule book?

Rooster Cogburn wrote:The rule is that the music must stop when the teams come to the line, right?The rules don't say anything about music, per se.

RagingTireFire wrote: Also, by rule, "unfair noise" is determined at the referee's discretion so I'm amazed at the depth of knowledge on this board that can decisively determine when the PA announcer is doing something "illegal" when the referee on the field cannot.Yes because a ref has never been wrong before.
You people astound me. And not in a good way.
2008 NCAA Rules and Regulations wrote:6. Persons subject to the rules, including bands, shall not create any noise that prohibits a team from hearing its signals (Rule 1-1-6). PENALTY—Dead-ball foul. 15 yards [S7 and S27] from the succeeding spot.
LUconn wrote: Yes because a ref has never been wrong before.I'm not even dignifying that. You people who show up once a week and think you know more than the people who've actually been trained for something are beyond belief.
If you'd read any further, you would have seen that the referee has the discretion to call an official timeout to address any "noise situation".2008 NCAA Rules and Regulations wrote:6. Persons subject to the rules, including bands, shall not create any noise that prohibits a team from hearing its signals (Rule 1-1-6). PENALTY—Dead-ball foul. 15 yards [S7 and S27] from the succeeding spot.Every single rule in the game of football is at the referee's discretion, obviously. They're not there just to keep score. Example: We scored a touchdown in the 4th quarter and at the discretion of the ref, they called turnover on downs.


LUconn wrote: But seriously, are you saying that a fan can never be correct vs a ref because we "show up once a week".I think the odds are distinctly in the ref's favor. And, in Ed Hochuli's world, nobody complains about noise from their own team's PA system.

LUconn wrote:The turnover on downs is a result of a subjective ball spotting (a poor one in this situation). I'm not suggesting he should have given us 5th down.You really think so? I watched the replay hoping that to be the case and you can’t see Rashad or the ball once he goes into the pile. And I didn’t see anything that would make me think he got in. I did have that horrible feeling in my stomach when the refs ran in to spot the ball that I had at the W&M game last year.
RagingTireFire wrote:Dude, that's sad that you actually went there with your argument. You're usually pretty good with backing up what you're talking about, but this was not a good example of that.LUconn wrote: Yes because a ref has never been wrong before.I'm not even dignifying that. You people who show up once a week and think you know more than the people who've actually been trained for something are beyond belief.
ALUmnus wrote:How so? Did some of you guys play PeeWee ball? Well, then I stand corrected. Clearly, the official is always wrong in light of your expansive collective football intellect. After all, the message board elite are surely more correct than a person who goes through years of training and constant evaluation. If it were only their paychecks on the line and not a simple Saturday afternoon pasttime, surely they would be better suited to the exacting standards that this board requires -- nay, demands!!RagingTireFire wrote:Dude, that's sad that you actually went there with your argument. You're usually pretty good with backing up what you're talking about, but this was not a good example of that.LUconn wrote: Yes because a ref has never been wrong before.I'm not even dignifying that. You people who show up once a week and think you know more than the people who've actually been trained for something are beyond belief.

ALUmnus wrote: It's been mentioned a couple times already, but that third down music is definitely illegal. I felt like I was at an NBA game. They blasted it right up to the snap on a few occasions, and it did cost LC a delay of game penalty. I can't believe that their coach didn't complain about it.
RagingTireFire wrote: How so? Did some of you guys play PeeWee ball? Well, then I stand corrected. Clearly, the official is always wrong in light of your expansive collective football intellect. After all, the message board elite are surely more correct than a person who goes through years of training and constant evaluation. If it were only their paychecks on the line and not a simple Saturday afternoon pasttime, surely they would be better suited to the exacting standards that this board requires -- nay, demands!!
Please.

RagingTireFire wrote:You must be a lawyer. You'd argue with a tree stump. And lose.
The referee stands right behind the QB. If it isn't a game issue to him on the field, how in hell is it an issue for Al in the 14th row?
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Hold My Own wrote:No. Do you?RagingTireFire wrote:You must be a lawyer. You'd argue with a tree stump. And lose.Be honest...do you believe that 95% of the world are idiots and you're in the select few?
The referee stands right behind the QB. If it isn't a game issue to him on the field, how in hell is it an issue for Al in the 14th row?

Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
ALUmnus wrote:I'm curious what RTF is so mad about. Nobody on here was complaining about the music, nobody said "we need to stop this immediately". We said it was obviously against the rules, and we couldn't believe that Lafayette didn't bring it to the ref's attention. LUConn, myself, nor anyone on here said we need to stop doing it, just pointing out the obvious. But come on, the "ref knows best" argument just doesn't fly. It's like those people who say "you've never played at a high level, you wouldn't understand". Pshah. Couldn't disagree more.To answer both of your questions, it annoys me that people just have to have something to complain about. In this case, people showed up and they're complaining about the music selections played during a football game. It's not like you're going to a concert. If you don't like the music during the game, bring a frickin' radio with you.

RagingTireFire wrote:ALUmnus wrote:I'm curious what RTF is so mad about. Nobody on here was complaining about the music, nobody said "we need to stop this immediately". We said it was obviously against the rules, and we couldn't believe that Lafayette didn't bring it to the ref's attention. LUConn, myself, nor anyone on here said we need to stop doing it, just pointing out the obvious. But come on, the "ref knows best" argument just doesn't fly. It's like those people who say "you've never played at a high level, you wouldn't understand". Pshah. Couldn't disagree more.To answer both of your questions, it annoys me that people just have to have something to complain about. In this case, people showed up and they're complaining about the music selections played during a football game. It's not like you're going to a concert. If you don't like the music during the game, bring a frickin' radio with you.
As for Al's bit, I never said the ref was infallible. My point is that you guys are claiming, "oh, this was clearly illegal" when the rules leave it entirely up to the judgement of the referee who is standing on the field mere feet from the quarterback. In a case like this, he is eminently more qualified to make that judgement by virtue of his training, his position and, above all, his physical location on the field than a bunch of mooks in the stands who have spent the last quarter and a half arguing over which music shouldn't be played.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
