- September 23rd, 2018, 7:11 pm
#559064
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke, Class of 20Something
Neo wrote:Better question. Why isn’t Gill redshirting Calvert and the other high skill guys with the hopes of having the pieces around them to win when we are actually bowl eligible?But LU is going to a Bowl game THIS year. Haven’t you been reading the thread
Cider Jim wrote:As bad as Buckshot looked, it could have been much worse. Didn't the Arkansas QB throw 6 interceptions against UNT compared to Buckshot's single interception?Buckshot QBR's 23.6 versus UNT, 45.7 Army, and 83.4 versus ODU. 80's are average ..
My only concern with play calling last night was why the coaching staff didn't rest Buckshot after the game was clearly out of reach. No need in risking injury when the game was already 40-7 in the fourth quarter.
ballcoach15 wrote:In the future, we should look at starting September games earlier, 12:00, 1:00 or 2:00. This would greatly reduce chance of thunderstorms disrupting game.I concur
CCWMichael wrote:Let’s change ten years of a scheduling philosophy that had experience 1-2 bad weather games because of one random fall with bad weather.ballcoach15 wrote:In the future, we should look at starting September games earlier, 12:00, 1:00 or 2:00. This would greatly reduce chance of thunderstorms disrupting game.I concur
Jonathan Carone wrote:They moved satrts up one hour to begin with andd later in the year has moved forward.CCWMichael wrote:Let’s change ten years of a scheduling philosophy that had experience 1-2 bad weather games because of one random fall with bad weather.ballcoach15 wrote:In the future, we should look at starting September games earlier, 12:00, 1:00 or 2:00. This would greatly reduce chance of thunderstorms disrupting game.I concur
Makes sense.
Yacht Rock wrote:Retractable roof. Prove me wrong.We've got the money...
Jonathan Carone wrote:They have years of stats that show the students don't show up nearly as much for day games, especially ones in September when it's hot outside. That's also why we don't do noon or 1pm kickoffs.Sources please?
I'm all for developing and adapting if there's data to say we should. But one fall with two storms isn't enough to make me think it's worth going up against the last ten years that says otherwise.
CCWMichael wrote:If you're looking for articles, I don't have that. I worked for the football team and the athletic department while in undergrad and seminary along with running the most organized fan group the school has ever had. This allowed me to have conversations with the people in charge and get to know a lot of the reasons why we did a lot of the things we did. While some of the leadership has changed since I left in 2010, the data still says the same thing:Jonathan Carone wrote:They have years of stats that show the students don't show up nearly as much for day games, especially ones in September when it's hot outside. That's also why we don't do noon or 1pm kickoffs.Sources please?
I'm all for developing and adapting if there's data to say we should. But one fall with two storms isn't enough to make me think it's worth going up against the last ten years that says otherwise.
jinxy wrote:6 pm is great in september. Just adapt when severe weather is called for. Its not that difficult but it does have to be planned and comminicated earlier.+1
rtb72 wrote:6 pm and mid afternoon games are much easier for those traveling to games with kids, too. Not sure how many families/fans are like mine....but hauling the family 2 hours would make noon games stressful.+1
rtb72 wrote:6 pm and mid afternoon games are much easier for those traveling to games with kids, too. Not sure how many families/fans are like mine....but hauling the family 2 hours would make noon games stressful.Our student section is phenomenal: however that is not where the cash flow comes from ...
Purple Haize wrote:Actually, that is still a possibility. A guy can play four games and not burn a red shirt. However, If we win our 4th game next week against a favored team, we will then have two wins with two games left against FCS teams and two winnable games against NMS. That would give us six wins and we would be bowl eligible. (does not insure bowl but with bowl agreement LU signed and past FBS bowl eligible stats, it would make a bowl likely). If we lose against NM then our road to six wins would be more difficult, and decisions would have to be made.Neo wrote:Better question. Why isn’t Gill redshirting Calvert and the other high skill guys with the hopes of having the pieces around them to win when we are actually bowl eligible?But LU is going to a Bowl game THIS year. Haven’t you been reading the thread
CCWMichael wrote:You're assuming we make decisions based on cash flow and ticket sales.rtb72 wrote:6 pm and mid afternoon games are much easier for those traveling to games with kids, too. Not sure how many families/fans are like mine....but hauling the family 2 hours would make noon games stressful.Our student section is phenomenal: however that is not where the cash flow comes from ...
I don't know if it's changed since I went but the […]