[PAmedic]

didn't know where to post it- but this is quite a historic ruling. It sets up a showdown on the US Supreme Court, meaning we'll get to see just where the 2 new justices stand on the issue.

South Dakota governor signs abortion ban

Nearly all operations outlawed in direct challenge to Roe v. Wade

Joe Kafka / AP
Updated: 3:04 p.m. ET March 6, 2006

PIERRE, S.D. - Gov. Mike Rounds signed legislation Monday banning nearly all abortions in South Dakota, setting up a court fight aimed at challenging the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion.

The bill would make it a crime for doctors to perform an abortion unless the procedure was necessary to save the woman’s life. It would make no exception for cases of rape or incest.

Planned Parenthood, which operates the state’s only abortion clinic, in Sioux Falls, has pledged to challenge the measure in court.

Rounds issued a written statement saying he expects the law will be tied up in court for years and will not take effect unless the U.S. Supreme Court upholds it.

“In the history of the world, the true test of a civilization is how well people treat the most vulnerable and most helpless in their society. The sponsors and supporters of this bill believe that abortion is wrong because unborn children are the most vulnerable and most helpless persons in our society. I agree with them,” Rounds said in the statement.

The governor declined all media requests for interviews Monday.

The Legislature passed the bill last month after supporters argued that the recent appointment of conservative justices John Roberts and Samuel Alito have made the U.S. Supreme Court more likely to overturn Roe v. Wade.

“This is proof-positive that Gov. Rounds cares more about politics than about the health and safety of women in South Dakota,” said Sarah Stoesz, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood regional operations for Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota, said in a statement Monday. “In every state, women, their families, and their doctors should be making private, personal health care decisions — not politicians.”

South Dakota’s abortion ban is to take effect July 1, but a federal judge is likely to suspend it during a legal challenge.

Abortion opponents donating money
Rounds has said abortion opponents already are offering money to help the state pay legal bills for the anticipated court challenge. Lawmakers said an anonymous donor has pledged $1 million to defend the ban, and the Legislature set up a special account to accept donations for legal fees.

Under the new law, doctors could get up to five years in prison for performing an illegal abortion.

Rounds previously issued a technical veto of a similar bill passed two years ago because it would have wiped out all existing restrictions on abortion while the bill was tied up for years in a court challenge.

The statement he issued Monday noted that this year’s bill was written to make sure existing restrictions will be enforced during the legal battle. Current state law sets increasingly stringent restrictions on abortions as pregnancy progresses. After the 24th week, the procedure is allowed only to protect the woman’s health and safety.

About 800 abortions are performed each year in South Dakota. Planned Parenthood has said other women cross state lines to reach clinics.

[LUconn]

Seems kinda early to me. Even if Roberts votes against Roe v Wade, it's still 5-4 upholding it. We were still waiting for that one more justice to retire/keel over.

[Ed Dantes]

Thanks for that LUConn. You know, even people like Jay Sekulow aren't thrilled, because the decision is going to force Alito & Roberts's hand early in this issue, making the confirmation for the next justice that much more difficult.

I mean, Alito is a guy who voted on the pro-choice side in 3 out of 4 instances -- and they grilled him.

But whatever. Maybe this will be the first step towards puttting an end the the abhorrent Roe v. Wade ruling.

[Hold My Own]

to bad only like 5 people live in SD

[Flamesfanva]

If only this abomination would come to an end. I agree though that if the new justices rule against anything on abortion (or as I refer to it...murder), it will no doubt make any nomination from a conservative president very difficult indeed.