[thepostman]

I’m sure something happened but I can’t prove it but I’m still pretty sure it did happen so I’m going to say it absolutely happened.

Did I say it absolutely happened? Nope. Thank you for playing.

A page or 2 back you did say you "know" Biden couldn't of gotten more votes than Obama which is all based on assumptions that something DID happen. So it is kind of hard to keep up here.

[Purple Haize]

I’m sure something happened but I can’t prove it but I’m still pretty sure it did happen so I’m going to say it absolutely happened.

Did I say it absolutely happened? Nope. Thank you for playing.

A page or 2 back you did say you "know" Biden couldn't of gotten more votes than Obama which is all based on assumptions that something DID happen. So it is kind of hard to keep up here.

Know v Prove. That’s what this discussion has been about. And now I’m out

[thepostman]

So you are saying something absolutely happened.

[paradox]

Why not? Perhaps something did happen. Who knows? After all, the Apostle himself said that in this world we see through a glass darkly. I'm pretty sure that it says somewhere else that this world is pretty corrupt . Not saying anything with any kind of certitude. Just sayin' that it seems like a legitimate thing to ponder. So, why not?

[thepostman]

No doubt. Nothing has really been proven but of course that doesn't mean nothing happened. It also doesn't mean it absolutely did either.

PH claimed to "know" something happened because it doesn't feel right and then tried to claim he never said anything absolutely happened. So if he isn't saying something absolutely happened then what he means to say is he thinks something happened.

Maybe I am being nitpicky...

Look, I'm not naive enough to think nothing happened but I'm not going to sit here and claim i KNOW something absolutely happened just because of how I feel. Thankfully that isn't how our justice system works.

[thepostman]

When you guys try to look to this man for any kind of credibility he goes and post stuff like this:

Kennedy lost both Florida and Ohio in 1960 and still won. It took a 2 second search or the the national archives to find this data.

https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/1960

I know this seems minor but he does this kind of thing all the time. He floats stuff out on twitter that aren't even remotely true and people take it as gospel and run with it. He isn't a random guy posting on Twitter. He is the President of the United States and a lot of people seem to believe every word he says and types. This includes election conspiracies as seen here in this thread.

[TH Spangler]

When you guys try to look to this man for any kind of credibility he goes and post stuff like this:

Kennedy lost both Florida and Ohio in 1960 and still won. It took a 2 second search or the the national archives to find this data.

https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/1960

I know this seems minor but he does this kind of thing all the time. He floats stuff out on twitter that aren't even remotely true and people take it as gospel and run with it. He isn't a random guy posting on Twitter. He is the President of the United States and a lot of people seem to believe every word he says and types. This includes election conspiracies as seen here in this thread.

Biden will be a much better potus. Who did he nominate for Secretary of Health and Education Services yesterday?

We need to get a Biden tread started pretty soon.

[JK37]

I said when he lost, Trump’s only going to get worse. Re-election was his only prior incentive to behave. Now? What reason does he have to act rightly?

[Jonathan Carone]

Certainly not a moral compass.

[chris leedlelee]

When you guys try to look to this man for any kind of credibility he goes and post stuff like this:

Not going to say Trump is playing 4D chess here, but it is highly likely that the 1960 election was stolen in Chicago and possibly other areas. So Trump might possibly be correct about this with or without meaning to be. If he is playing 4D chess, he meant to point out that a previous Presidential election was also stolen as well.

[TH Spangler]

For many cycles the deepstate has dictate each parties nominee. They basically know they can control either one, then they let us vote which one it will be. Trump bucked the system. By doing so he partially pulled back the curtain for all to see. He's lucky to get out of DC alive

[rhezick]

I just find it laughable and a bit hypocritical that the whole argument in the past 36 days has been "let it play out in the courts" and propping up the courts as the arbiter of truth. And then, when 50 some lawsuits have been dismissed and Trump's own appointees have thrown out the lawsuits, we result to "well, disregard, I've just got a feeling." That's fine. To each their own. But it just seems that there's a point where the truth is irrelevant.

[TH Spangler]

I just find it laughable and a bit hypocritical that the whole argument in the past 36 days has been "let it play out in the courts" and propping up the courts as the arbiter of truth. And then, when 50 some lawsuits have been dismissed and Trump's own appointees have thrown out the lawsuits, we result to "well, disregard, I've just got a feeling." That's fine. To each their own. But it just seems that there's a point where the truth is irrelevant.

I agree. Mail in ballot scam worked. It's a done deal. It's time to get the Biden thread started. It's going to be a crazy ride.

[stokesjokes]

What a scam, making it easier for people to vote, how dare they!

[Jonathan Carone]

I just find it laughable and a bit hypocritical that the whole argument in the past 36 days has been "let it play out in the courts" and propping up the courts as the arbiter of truth. And then, when 50 some lawsuits have been dismissed and Trump's own appointees have thrown out the lawsuits, we result to "well, disregard, I've just got a feeling." That's fine. To each their own. But it just seems that there's a point where the truth is irrelevant.

Any sense of logic has gone out the window at this point. When people truly believe they are taking down The Man, they’ve made up their mind that something was wrong and will do whatever it takes to prove it. Anything that stands in their way will be something The Man put in place because they’re bigger and more powerful and will do whatever it takes to hold onto power. Someone on “their side” (ie Republican appointed judges) wasn’t a true believer if they abandon the mission.

[TH Spangler]

What a scam, making it easier for people to vote, how dare they!

Broke state laws to carryout the vote harvest though.

I won't go into a lot of detail but I use to be a AFL-CIO shop steward, attended meeting in Pennsylvania. All the leaders doubled as Democrat party activist. It was an eye opening experience.

[TH Spangler]

Demacrats saw Trump as the man. Anything goes . Its funny how easly these view points can be flipped

[stokesjokes]

What a scam, making it easier for people to vote, how dare they!

Broke state laws to carryout the vote harvest though.

That’s a new one. Good thing they took their evidence to court and were proven legit, right?

[stokesjokes]

Also, you mean to tell me that union organizers were democrats? Someone get Lou Dobbs on the phone, we’ve got a breaking story

[TH Spangler]

Also, you mean to tell me that union organizers were democrats? Someone get Lou Dobbs on the phone, we’ve got a breaking story

I'm telling you they lack a moral compass

[stokesjokes]

We’re they not supposed to be Democrats? I’m so confused

[TH Spangler]

I’m so confused

[thepostman]

The highest court in the land has spoken. I'm sure there will be excuses from the outgoing President but the Supreme Court has made it clear their opinion on it.

[Jonathan Carone]

Parler is a bit nuts tonight.

[TH Spangler]

Some of you think you're winning Not one bit suprising to those of us with a Biblical worldview.