- March 25th, 2019, 3:35 pm
#575302
However, I would say that the person who has the talent to make it to an upper level in a company to begin with likely has the talent to have their employer subsidize their education to begin with, undergrad and all. By the time one student graduates with an MBA and no work experience, another has spent years on the job, possibly an undergrad degree that's paid for by their employer and years of seniority, bonuses, stock options, etc. Yeah, it might take them a few more years to get their full undergrad and postgrad but in the end, they have the potential to be much better off financially than the alternative.
The way we measure human capital is drastically changing and it scares some folks who have invested a lot into the formal education system as students, parents, teachers, administrators.
The good news is, the burst of the education bubble won't result in the dark ages of human knowledge as most documented knowledge will be open and accessible. In addition, delivery through a variety of modalities will be more common as technology improves.
Sly Fox wrote:I will tell you that upper levels of companies the paper still matters. he difference being that the companies are generally foting the bill for the postgrad expenses.I can tell you from experience, that for some of the largest and most successful companies in the country, it doesn't matter as much as you'd like to think. And it's not uncommon for companies to pay for at least a portion of undergrad and postgrad education. The big difference is that this is all after an employee has already been hired and identified as talent. Education is definitely an important part of talent retention and development.
However, I would say that the person who has the talent to make it to an upper level in a company to begin with likely has the talent to have their employer subsidize their education to begin with, undergrad and all. By the time one student graduates with an MBA and no work experience, another has spent years on the job, possibly an undergrad degree that's paid for by their employer and years of seniority, bonuses, stock options, etc. Yeah, it might take them a few more years to get their full undergrad and postgrad but in the end, they have the potential to be much better off financially than the alternative.
The way we measure human capital is drastically changing and it scares some folks who have invested a lot into the formal education system as students, parents, teachers, administrators.
The good news is, the burst of the education bubble won't result in the dark ages of human knowledge as most documented knowledge will be open and accessible. In addition, delivery through a variety of modalities will be more common as technology improves.