- August 23rd, 2017, 3:04 pm
#535209
I was discussing about why the modern day rules doesnt need to change, so your question has been irrelevant.
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
cruzan_flame13 wrote:I was discussing about why the modern day rules doesnt need to change, so your question has been irrelevant.
Yacht Rock wrote:'Modern Day? Yeah. That video is appropriatecruzan_flame13 wrote:I was discussing about why the modern day rules doesnt need to change, so your question has been irrelevant.
cruzan_flame13 wrote:I was discussing about why the modern day rules doesnt need to change, so your question has been irrelevant.You seemed to be endorsing child abuse. Please clarify your position.
LUnpretty11 wrote:PH, your BJ skills impress me.
adam42381 wrote:You beat me to it.cruzan_flame13 wrote:I was discussing about why the modern day rules doesnt need to change, so your question has been irrelevant.You seemed to be endorsing child abuse. Please clarify your position.
alabama24 wrote:#toosoonadam42381 wrote:You beat me to it.cruzan_flame13 wrote:I was discussing about why the modern day rules doesnt need to change, so your question has been irrelevant.You seemed to be endorsing child abuse. Please clarify your position.
alabama24 wrote:Violence isn't the answeradam42381 wrote:You beat me to it.cruzan_flame13 wrote:I was discussing about why the modern day rules doesnt need to change, so your question has been irrelevant.You seemed to be endorsing child abuse. Please clarify your position.
adam42381 wrote:Endorsing child abuse by stating Lu's rules that they have now is not so bad? It's not perfect, but how is it abusive?cruzan_flame13 wrote:I was discussing about why the modern day rules doesnt need to change, so your question has been irrelevant.You seemed to be endorsing child abuse. Please clarify your position.
cruzan_flame13 wrote:With some discipline that has be characterized as abuse(although those are not, like beating[not severely] your child when they have done something wrong), so most kids are not discipline.These are your words. Explain.
Yacht Rock wrote:I'm guessing he realizes that he sounds like a crazy person and can't justify his statements.So....normal
Yacht Rock wrote:he got hacked. Obviously.cruzan_flame13 wrote:With some discipline that has be characterized as abuse(although those are not, like beating[not severely] your child when they have done something wrong), so most kids are not discipline.These are your words. Explain.
thepostman wrote:FIFYYacht Rock wrote:he got WHACKED. Obviously.cruzan_flame13 wrote:With some discipline that has be characterized as abuse(although those are not, like beating[not severely] your child when they have done something wrong), so most kids are not discipline.These are your words. Explain.
JK37 wrote:The more relaxed the Liberty Way, the less distinctive the University. From a strictly business or marketing perspective - which is where I think this conversation began - one cannot give up what makes one unique.Do we want to be unique because of our rules or because of our curriculum of required worldview, Bible, and theology classes?
JK37 wrote:I've never considered the rules mentioned here as "behavior modification."Curfew: As a grown up I've found a lot of legitimate reasons for being out after midnight.
Curfew: why am I out after midnight?
Alcohol: why do I need it?
Coed dorms: please.
Dress code: the most life-preparatory prerogatives the school still thankfully offers
Hair: fits close to dress code, IMO
Many have said LU needs a stronger focus on training champions for Christ. Isn't "training" just another term for behavior modification?
Distinctives of curriculum, theology and the Liberty Way are not mutually exclusive.
JK37 wrote:I've never considered the rules mentioned here as "behavior modification."
Curfew: why am I out after midnight?
Alcohol: why do I need it?
Coed dorms: please.
Dress code: the most life-preparatory prerogatives the school still thankfully offers
Hair: fits close to dress code, IMO
Many have said LU needs a stronger focus on training champions for Christ. Isn't "training" just another term for behavior modification?
Distinctives of curriculum, theology and the Liberty Way are not mutually exclusive.
Jonathan Carone wrote:There's a difference in behavior management and setting up guardrails to protect students.
Curfew and keeping opposite sexes out of the dorms are guardrails. They are their for the benefit of the student even if they don't realize it at the time.
No alcohol for 21+ (and faculty), dress code, and cleanliness inspections are all behavior modifications. They distract from the overall mission of the school and keep potentially great students away.
I'm all for guardrails and structure. I'm not at all in favor of behavior modification.
JK37 wrote:I've never considered the rules mentioned here as "behavior modification."In regards to the dress code, when I worked for the state I could wear shorts and flip flops. Today I am working from home, where there is obviously no dress code.
Curfew: why am I out after midnight?
Alcohol: why do I need it?
Coed dorms: please.
Dress code: the most life-preparatory prerogatives the school still thankfully offers
Hair: fits close to dress code, IMO
Many have said LU needs a stronger focus on training champions for Christ. Isn't "training" just another term for behavior modification?
Distinctives of curriculum, theology and the Liberty Way are not mutually exclusive.
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right