BuryYourDuke wrote:Pretty much anything other than what he did. It's amazing how often I take someone to the hospital that violently doesn't want to go without throwing them across the room, tasing them, or choking them out.
Removing students from the room is a decent option.
Again, like what? The SRO didn't Taz or choke the girl out. He tried to remove her from a desk, which is difficult enough, while she was hitting him and flopping around. It looked a whole lot worse than it was. I would suspect in your line of work you are not having to pull unwilling people out of a desk or confined space. Interestingly, the Sheriff couldn't say exactly what the SRO did wrong nor what he could have done differently. The Teacher, the Principal, and students who were interviewed did not feel that the level of force used was excessive. And when the student left, class went back to normal.
I have heard several people suggest that the other students should have left the room, then the student should have been dealt with. IMO, that would be the worse thing to do. You reward the student who is disruptive, you further disrupt the other 20 odd students and take away their learning opportunity. Then you have a series 'he said/she said' situation if the incident escalates. And the SRO would most likely have to physically remove her anyways.
What happened to personal responsibility? At what point does a persons lack of following requests by authority figures become enough? Now she will go through the rest of her life thinking the rules don't apply to her. She will suffer no negative consequences for her actions. Instead, she will receive a nice settlement from the Party's involved. She will be held up as an icon and people will continue to make excuses for her. That's the bigger issue with this story.