- April 7th, 2017, 11:11 pm
#529276
Assad is not the issue here. Not saying he's a great guy but Syria will be worst than what it is. For centuries Syria was the country in the Middle East where Muslims and Christians actually lived amongst each other with no hostility. Of course the bureaucrats in Washington who are greedy and evil wants to take out Assad and put in a puppet government that will be worst. This is the same lie that was used with Saddam Hussein during the early 1990's where they said he was using chemical gas on his own people and also when they used the girl who told the world under tears that she saw how Hussein's soldiers took babies out of their incubators and let them die on the cold floor( turns out that girl wasn't even in Kuwait during that time and she was in fact the daughter of the Kuwati ambassador of the U.S.). Then Novembre 1990 Bush 41 continued this lie to the poor soldiers. So yes this is another lie so that U.S. can use another noble lie to get us to kill a dictator in order to put in a puppet government that is worst( same thing that occurred in Libya. The bigger problem is actually China but our controlled politicians and and media is pointing fingers to Russia just because elitist(like George Soros and the late David Rockefeller) hate Russia and actually wants to destroy it. These folks want another world war and is based off of geopolitics and the dollar. The issue is they font want Russia and other countries to stop using the dollar and instead use oil (from Syria for example) to trade for gold. This will destroy what is left of the dollar being a dominant global currency. China is a economical power and they have a great sphere of influence around the world (you can definitely see it in Africa) and even America (our trade, buying land that the U.S. government illegally stole from Americans, Hollywood to use for propaganda). Our corrupted bureaucrats have made China the powerhouse that is today. Sorry for the rambling but I just wanted to point out some things that we are not told about. Trump is bring lied to about the situation and this a crucial moment in history. I just hop he doesn't take the bait that will lead us to more catastrophe. Remember war is money and its the central bank that gain this cash flow. If this follow through, it's the bankers who'll win and the citizens on both side of the conflict that has to deal with the pain and horror.[/quote]
Just a future note for you, some people will discredit you opinion based on the sheer quantity of spelling, grammatical and syntax errors in your post. I highlighted some of the errors just to help you in the future. There is still a lot of missing punctuation but many people will view an opinion as lesser because of how it was presented. Again, I'm not trying to belittle you, but help you be taken seriously in the future.[/quote]
________________________________
I'll have to take issue with a few items here. Saddam killed thousands of boarder kurds near the end of the Iraq/Iran conflict. This was essentially a genocide in the 80's and many lived in Kurdish occupied areas inside the boarders of Iraq. Assad has been extremely aggressive against the Kurdish people. Although there was tranquility "for centuries" that does not exist anymore and with the infusion of radicalized islamist....it will not be a future realization. There may be some Muslim/Christian tranquility...but it is extremely covert and isolated. As for Desert Storm, we never attacked Iraq per se...the intent was to repulse the continued occupation of Kuwait. As a matter of fact, the ground war was only a few hours. We hit the ground in Kuwait and were never mission oriented to invade Iraq. I take personal issue with your insulation that Soldiers and Marines were simply lied to and pushed forward on some government initiated charade. I for one knew the confirmed intel from credible sources fully supported the US mission in aid to Kuwait. I also know this mission manifested after the UN was ignored by the Saddam regime. As for the second Iraq war; I will acknowledge that WMD's were not found...but to suggest there was no evidence of their previous existence or the fact they easily could have been moved based on the time frame of engagement is very naïve. As a matter of fact, some intel suggest the Syrians may have been beneficiaries to those very WMD's. Likewise, their return could have been easily achieved once the inspectors left. Inspectors who I might add, were denied access to certain areas in Iraq. I've been out of the service for some time now, and I don't know what branch you served in or what credible intel sources you have clearance for.....but the hyperbole and conspiratorial rhetoric you contribute is only supported by ideological talking heads. I will not defend our inability to nation build nor will I suggest we should engage in that arena...especially in the middle east. However, the work that was being done in Iraq and Afghanistan could have yielded more positive results....had we not let a vacuum develop. This was partly our fault, but we also had very little support from the UN and many resources never made their intended destination. But to suggest it was all based on lies and a get-rich-quick scheme is an insult to me and many other veterans. Did Assad deploy chemical warfare against his own. I don't know, and I'd assert you don't either! But I will say the historical trends and implications indicate it is highly probable. It's easy to listen to the pundits and draw conclusions based on "pieces of the story". My only suggestion would be you go to a veteran who was actually there and involved mission related movements based on vetted intel, and ask them.