A Sea Of Red

I have a hunch it is this....

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=353382

Over an extremely rigorous objection by the defense, Judge Reid admitted into evidence exhibits and testimony of witnesses Paul Irey and Felicito Papa.

Mr. Papa testified that he graduated from the Indiana Institute of Technology had some 20 years of experience with Adobe Illustrator program. He testified that Obama”s birth certificate opened in Adobe illustrator in 9 layers, which means that this is a document, which underwent computer manipulation. Mr. Papa testified that it cannot be a genuine document, as in 1961 there was no Adobe Illustrator. Birth certificates in 1961 were created not on the computer, but with a typewriter. He stated his opinion that this is a forgery. His exhibits, showing layers within the document, were admitted into evidence.

It will be interesting to see what becomes of the controversies around his birth certificate and college records when he loses in 2 weeks

Purple Haize wrote:It will be interesting to see what becomes of the controversies around his birth certificate and college records when he loses in 2 weeks

Lol. Well, I actually would rather like to hear what the defense used as evidence to base their strong objection to the expert witness's testimony. That essentially seals whether it should be allowed or not. The judge's opinion would also be nice to have to read.

I would hate my academic record being opened.

What kind of idiot forgers would submit an original electronic forgery as the actual certificate? I'm no document forger, but it seems pretty obvious that you'd create it, print it out as a genuine birth certificate and then scan that as would have been done when moving to electronic documents from physical ones. Makes me think that this story is not accurate.

Could Trump have been scooped?

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2 ... ans-reject

Honestly this whole thing is a red herring.

red herring in politics?? never

The newest guess is that it is divorce files that Michelle almost filed 10 years ago. If so, the "Donald" is despicable and we would have a better grasp on what he meant by "get even."

alabama24 wrote:The newest guess is that it is divorce files that Michelle almost filed 10 years ago. If so, the "Donald" is despicable and we would have a better grasp on what he meant by "get even."

That's true. It's what Obama did TWICE in running for office in Illinois.

Do people keep files that they "almost filed" 10 years ago?

is one of his business failing for the umpteenth time?

ALUmnus wrote:Do people keep files that they "almost filed" 10 years ago?

Their lawyers do.

Trump needs to keep quite if he doesnt have him caught and when I mean caught I mean even CNN cant spin it...or else there is a chance this could cause Obama to become a sympathetic figure which could cause a bump in the polls

I'm pretty impressed that they were that close to a divorce 10 years ago and they seem to have a pretty darn strong marriage today. They worked it out. It's what our pastors are always begging society to do.

LUconn wrote:I'm pretty impressed that they were that close to a divorce 10 years ago and they seem to have a pretty darn strong marriage today. They worked it out. It's what our pastors are always begging society to do.

+1

They've got nothing on the Clintons. Look at all they've been through and are still "together".

One of the reasons I like Romney is his strong marriage and family. I've long suspected there is more to the Obamas marriage then meets the eye. Everything else about him is so carefully crafted the marriage might be as well. Maybe I'm too cynical and getting a little tin foil hatish and I hope I'm wrong.

The billionaire followed that up with a quotation from "Chinese" author Sun Tzu reading, 'Invincibility lies in the defence; the possibility of victory in the attack.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ds-newsxml

Who is Sun Tzu ... do you think this has something to do with Obama - China relations?

For Sun Tzu, writing in China five hundred years before Christ, the art of war revolves around those same practices, coupled with a profound skill at deceit. To overwhelm an enemy, the enemy must have no idea what it is you intend. Subordinates also must have no idea what it is you intend, and the control of information should be carefully managed to insure that no-one knows any more than they need to know to accomplish your al. Deceiving your own troops is equally important, so that you can lead them boldly into a place where they have no choice but to fight to the death.

http://thesermonrepository.blogspot.com ... oh-my.html

I read Art of War twice in college.
Robert E Lee and Pat Riley were also fans ha

Well, what do you think? ..... Is ha all we get? Would honestly like to hear your thoughts Haize?

I love the Art of War. I'm voting for Obama

TH Spangler wrote:Well, what do you think? ..... Is ha all we get? Would honestly like to hear your thoughts Haize?

You want my reflection on Sun Tzu? Or my missive that you can't compare an athletic event like basketball to warfare?
EVERY military leader has read Sun Tzu. I don't think there is any great conspiracy of Obama using AoW. While I will agree that Obamas rise has been scripted and it may have some elements taken from Sun Tzu. But I think the rise was crafted more on other philosophies.

[youtube][/youtube]

Maybe if he does this we will know who's behind his rise.

Well that was a waste of the 20 seconds I spent thinking about what it could be