Page 1 of 1
Third Party debates
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 12:54 pm
by NotAJerry
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/1 ... 88014.html
http://reason.com/blog/2012/10/19/liber ... s-again-to
It should serve as a surprise to no one that legitimate news sources, like Al-Jezeera English and Russia Today, will cover the third party debates while the mainstream US press won't spend its time doing something legitimate and will continue to force two predetermined piles of garbage down our throats.
We'll continue to get nothing but scripted, reality-TV like "debates" while the supposed news agencies of Fox, MSNBC, CNN and others refuse to jeopardize the advertising dollars they get from the big two parties by continuing to support a broken system that makes democracy little more than a sham.
Re: Third Party debates
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 1:07 pm
by jbock13
NotAJerry wrote:
It should serve as a surprise to no one that legitimate news sources, like Al-Jezeera English and Russia Today
Are you okay man? I know you hate me but I care about you my friend.
Oh and btw, we're a representative republic, not a democracy.
Re: Third Party debates
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 7:51 pm
by Purple Haize
The networks were fired up when there was a legit 3rd Party Candidate. Granted the guy was great TV which didn't hurt. If a legit 3rd party candidate arises the media will be there.
Re: Third Party debates
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 8:05 pm
by jbock13
I'm just glad that .36% of the electorate actually care

Re: Third Party debates
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 8:07 pm
by Purple Haize
jbock13 wrote:I'm just glad that .36% of the electorate actually ARE NOT BRAINWASHED BY THE JEWISH CONTROLLED MEDIA:I am laughing out loud. I typed "LOL" but that is for teenage girls who text. So please know that I am laughing. Out loud.:
FIFY
Re: Third Party debates
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 8:34 pm
by jbock13
Haha, now I didn't say that. But you're right to point that out about his statements.
Re: Third Party debates
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 8:44 pm
by Purple Haize
jbock13 wrote:Haha, now I didn't say that. But you're right to point that out about his statements.
Well as a Chinese sympathizer who gets his news from Al-Jazeera it isn't a large leap in logic. Dare I say 9/11 Truther is next. Ha
Re: Third Party debates
Posted: October 20th, 2012, 8:53 pm
by jbock13
Purple Haize wrote:jbock13 wrote:Haha, now I didn't say that. But you're right to point that out about his statements.
Well as a Chinese sympathizer who gets his news from Al-Jazeera it isn't a large leap in logic. Dare I say 9/11 Truther is next. Ha
They do have a pretty neat soccer channel though...
Re: Third Party debates
Posted: October 21st, 2012, 11:09 pm
by Hold My Own
I just pray that their .36% doesnt split this vote
Re: Third Party debates
Posted: October 22nd, 2012, 1:00 pm
by RubberMallet
i would of watched it if i knew it was on. probably hilarious.
Re: Third Party debates
Posted: October 22nd, 2012, 1:16 pm
by ALUmnus
I watched the Libertarian Party candidate debate, and it was pretty awful. Given the intellectual superiority of libertarians, they sure don't seem to have much to choose from.
Re: Third Party debates
Posted: October 22nd, 2012, 2:12 pm
by RubberMallet
thats one of the reasons i've been very hesitant to call myself a libertarian. i agree with many of their stances but geez....