This is the location for conversations that don't fall anywhere else on FlameFans. Whether its politics, culture, the latest techno stuff or just the best places to travel on the web ... this is your forum.

Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke

By Hold My Own
Registration Days Posts
#304816
I just posted this on my facebook....really I have not come across a name that I thought is a perfect option for someone to run against Obama until tonight. However does he even want to run?
David Petraeus for President: Run General, run

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... l-run.html

With many voters yearning for an outsider, and military officers looked up to, General David Petraeus could be a powerful presidential candidate and a potentially accomplished President.
_________________________________________________________________________

Americans have never been so disgusted with their politicians. More than three-quarters of Americans disapprove of Congress. President Barack Obama's favourability ratings have slumped to below 50 per cent and he is no longer trusted or believed by many who voted for him.
Republicans are faring little better and the growth of the Tea Party movement reflects the widespread disgust with Washington and the political class. Incumbents across the board are vulnerable in November's mid-term elections.


Many voters yearn for an outsider, someone with authenticity, integrity and proven accomplishment. Someone who has not spent their life plotting how to ascend the greasy pole, adjusting every utterance for maximum political advantage.
In this toxic climate, perhaps the only public institution that has increased in prestige in recent years is the American military. Its officers are looked upon, as General George Patton once noted, as "the modern representatives of the demi-gods and heroes of antiquity".
Where better to look for Obama's successor, therefore, than in the uniformed ranks? Not since 1952, when a certain Dwight Eisenhower, Supreme Commander of Allied Forces in Europe during the Second World War, was elected President, have the chances of a military man winning the White House been more propitious.
Within those ranks, no one stands out like General David Petraeus, head of United States Central Command, leader of 230,000 troops and commander of United States forces in two wars. Having masterminded the Iraq surge, the stunning military gambit that seized victory from the jaws of defeat, he is now directing an equally daunting undertaking in Afghanistan.
Petraeus, 57, has survived the collapse of his parachute 60 feet above the ground. After he was shot in the chest during a training exercise and endured five hours surgery, the then battalion commander refused to lie in hospital recuperating. Demanding that the tubes be removed from his arm, he declared: "I am not the norm."
A Princeton PhD, he has revolutionised the way America fights its wars, inculcating the doctrine of counter-insurgency in a new generation of officers who have finally put the ghost of Vietnam to rest. At West Point he qualified for medical school just to prove he could, never bothering to apply.
The problem is that Petraeus appears to have no desire to be commander-in-chief. His denials of any political ambition have come close to the famous statement by General William Sherman. The former American Civil War commander, rejecting the possibility of running for president in 1884 by stating: "I will not accept if nominated and will not serve if elected."
Yet speculation about "Petraeus in 2012" persists. The White House is wary of him just as President Bill Clinton was wary of General Colin Powell in 1995. Rumours that he wants to run have even reached Downing Street.
At a recent appearance in New Hampshire - which happens to be the state in which the first presidential primary will be held in January 2012 - Petraeus was emphatic.
"I thought I'd said 'no' about as many ways as I could. I really do mean no," he insisted when asked if he was destined for politics. "I've tried quoting a country song 'What part of 'no' don't you understand?' but I really do mean that...I will not ever run for political office, I can assure you." Almost Shermanesque.
Some note, however, when the future President Barack Obama was asked in February 2007 if he would serve his full six-year term in the Senate (due to expire in 2010), he responded: "If you get asked enough, sooner or later you get weary and you start looking for new ways of saying things." When asked directly if he would run for the White House in 2008, he said flatly: "I will not."
There's little reason to doubt the sincerity of Petraeus's denials. He recently confided that he has remained so steadfastly apolitical since he became a major-general that he has not voted. And he has maintained a much lower profile since the Bush administration, when he became closely identified with the former President.
This month, in an interview for a lengthy and laudatory profile in Vanity Fair, he evens praises Obama as being "everything that everyone says he is... exceedingly bright, very focused - and very competitive, by the way".
Petraeus, wire-thin and an accomplished runner, is known for being one of the most competitive men on the planet and he lacks nothing in the self-assurance department. No one has ever accused him of being deficient in his sense of patriotism.
Whether as an independent or as Republican, he could be a powerful presidential candidate and a potentially accomplished President. He may not want to run but if the clamour to draft him grows he might just find the call of duty - not to mention the contest of a lifetime - difficult to resist.
User avatar
By Sly Fox
Registration Days Posts
#304823
He's an enigma since so little of his political persuasions are known beyond his close family & friends. The comparisons to Powell are on target in a number of regards.

Frankly, Conservatives aren't exactly overwhelmed with quality viable options right now.
By LUconn
Registration Days Posts
#304826
Does anybody know anything about what he believes in other than the military? He could be a Stalinist for all you know.
User avatar
By SumItUp
Registration Days Posts
#304830
I want a President that will first and foremost defend the Constitution. It is important to understand their ideology and how it was formed. It is not sufficient to listen to the rhetoric that is spouted during the campaign process.
By pcguy09
Registration Days Posts
#304865
My father and Gen Petraeus are very close friends and have been since they both started out in the Army. We still get personal Christmas cards and letters from Gen Petraeus, and he is a great man. This is the first i have heard his name mentioned in connection to the 2012 elections, but i will ask my dad how he thinks he would be or what his political thoughts are.
By pcguy09
Registration Days Posts
#305044
A little update from my father. He said he doesn't know for sure if Gen Patraeus is a christian or not so as far as social issues, he does not feel that he has any lean towards certain views. He does strive on being highly thought of, but he feels like he wants what is best for America. He is not an extreme right or extreme left, and my dad also feels like he wouldn't be "hawkish" military wise. Meaning that he would always be willing to pull the trigger on the war.
Personally he thinks he would be on the republican side, and that he would be an extremely hard-worker. He said that he wouldn't want to be his chief of staff because there would be no sleeping. Lastly, he doesn't think that Patraeus would run for office, but he said that he could not say for sure about social stances Patraeus had, except for defending what America was founded for and on.
FIU

Oh absolutely, ECC29 is clearly operating on a fro[…]

25/26 Season

The person who is emotionally or personally […]

Transfer Portal Reaction

Oh, HCJC really needs to prove they can actually c[…]

I hate you Merry Christmas :D :lol: May[…]