Page 1 of 1

Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 11th, 2010, 2:56 pm
by blwall1416
So says the Obama administration, according to the article.
Feds push for tracking cell phones

....................

In that case, the Obama administration has argued that warrantless tracking is permitted because Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in their--or at least their cell phones'--whereabouts.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10451518-38.html

Re: Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 12th, 2010, 11:55 am
by RubberMallet
awesome

Re: Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 12th, 2010, 12:02 pm
by LUconn
I really do enjoy my lack of reasonable expectation of privacy. It's so enjoyable.

Re: Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 12th, 2010, 12:34 pm
by ATrain
Well does that mean no more abortions, since Roe v. Wade was based on an issue of privacy?

Re: Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 12th, 2010, 2:07 pm
by ALUmnus
Or sodomy laws, right? So at last we learn that privacy is not a right....right?

Re: Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 12th, 2010, 2:25 pm
by RubberMallet
ALUmnus wrote:Or sodomy laws, right? So at last we learn that privacy is not a right....right?
wow....freaky deaky in the K household apparently.

Re: Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 12th, 2010, 3:12 pm
by ATrain
RubberMallet wrote:
ALUmnus wrote:Or sodomy laws, right? So at last we learn that privacy is not a right....right?
wow....freaky deaky in the K household apparently.
Hey, what ALUmnus and his wife do in their bedroom is their business...and the government's according to Obama

Re: Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 12th, 2010, 3:25 pm
by LUconn
well. this has taken an interesting turn.

Re: Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 12th, 2010, 9:53 pm
by El Scorcho
I remarked to friends on our way to lunch yesterday that this is just a further expansion of the warrantless wiretaps and Patriot Act type of law enforcement that became acceptable under Bush. The GOP didn't care then. Why care now?

Re: Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 13th, 2010, 2:30 am
by PAmedic
El Scorcho wrote:I remarked to friends on our way to lunch yesterday that this is just a further expansion of the warrantless wiretaps and Patriot Act type of law enforcement that became acceptable under Bush. The GOP didn't care then. Why care now?
I knew this would bring you outta the woodwork.

Surprised it took ya so long.

I still love ya, tho

Re: Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 13th, 2010, 9:51 am
by ALUmnus
El Scorcho wrote:I remarked to friends on our way to lunch yesterday that this is just a further expansion of the warrantless wiretaps and Patriot Act type of law enforcement that became acceptable under Bush. The GOP didn't care then. Why care now?
I haven't read everything out there, but I don't think the GOP is expressing outrage at this, I think people are just pointing out the blatent hypocrisy of Obama and the media.

Re: Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 13th, 2010, 10:47 am
by LUconn
In all seriousness I don't see how this would be illegal, but SCOTUS would have to take it on to throw it out. And they've already decided that the police can use tracking monitors on people/cars without a warrant as they could already trail someone without a warrant. This is of a similar nature. This isn't really gonna help anybody do anything though as dumb criminals will eventually catch on to what a smart criminal already does, use a prepaid cellphone from walmart and throw it out.

Re: Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 13th, 2010, 10:56 am
by PAmedic
As far as law enforcement goes, federal law is basically a minimum standard- states can write more restrictive legislation, and PA does.

we are one of the most heavily restricted when it comes to wiretapping rules: to the point where it is VERY rare for us to seek a warrant to do so.

any new laws would likely be superceded by ones already on the books here in PA- so SCORCHO is safe to carry on his subversion and small-bidniz efforts, at least, up here.

Re: Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 13th, 2010, 11:47 am
by El Scorcho
PAmedic wrote:As far as law enforcement goes, federal law is basically a minimum standard- states can write more restrictive legislation, and PA does.

we are one of the most heavily restricted when it comes to wiretapping rules: to the point where it is VERY rare for us to seek a warrant to do so.

any new laws would likely be superceded by ones already on the books here in PA- so SCORCHO is safe to carry on his subversion and small-bidniz efforts, at least, up here.
I'm not worried about the locals.

Re: Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

Posted: February 13th, 2010, 12:02 pm
by ALUmnus
El Scorcho wrote:
PAmedic wrote:As far as law enforcement goes, federal law is basically a minimum standard- states can write more restrictive legislation, and PA does.

we are one of the most heavily restricted when it comes to wiretapping rules: to the point where it is VERY rare for us to seek a warrant to do so.

any new laws would likely be superceded by ones already on the books here in PA- so SCORCHO is safe to carry on his subversion and small-bidniz efforts, at least, up here.
I'm not worried about the locals.
Uh oh, sounds like a plan's afoot.