Do you read the WND?

Do you read the WND?#256440

By Rockthejungle - May 1st, 2009, 11:08 am

- May 1st, 2009, 11:08 am #256440

Do any of you read WorldNetDaily?Jonathan Falwell does a commentary on the site.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php? ... geId=95292

#256444

By flamesfan30 - May 1st, 2009, 11:15 am

- May 1st, 2009, 11:15 am #256444

i have a freind who posts a ton links on facebook to that site. so i do sometimes read various articles in there but im not an avid reader of the site, no. (but i still voted yes)

#256447

By LUconn - May 1st, 2009, 11:18 am

- May 1st, 2009, 11:18 am #256447

for as many "good" articles that they have, they have some real crackpots with crazy conspiracy theories.

*please disregard this post if dated before 2017 and accept my apologies*

#256449

By Rockthejungle - May 1st, 2009, 11:21 am

- May 1st, 2009, 11:21 am #256449

LUconn wrote:for as many "good" articles that they have, they have some real crackpots with crazy conspiracy theories.

Who are the crackpots?I'm just wondering.

#256456

By Sly Fox - May 1st, 2009, 11:39 am

- May 1st, 2009, 11:39 am #256456

I don't read it that regularly but GulfTX does and passes on the better material to me. I do enjoy Farah's takes on Islam in a fashion similar to the Caner brothers.

#256489

By Ed Dantes - May 1st, 2009, 1:08 pm

- May 1st, 2009, 1:08 pm #256489

Rockthejungle wrote:
LUconn wrote:for as many "good" articles that they have, they have some real crackpots with crazy conspiracy theories.
Who are the crackpots?I'm just wondering.

It rhymes with "Matt Muchanan."

"You won't have Nixon to kick around any more, because, gentlemen, this is my last press conference." - Richard Nixon
"You won't have Dantes to kick around any more, because, members of Flame Fans, this is my last post." - Ed Dantes

#256504

By ALUmnus - May 1st, 2009, 2:19 pm

- May 1st, 2009, 2:19 pm #256504

I used to go there regularly, but they do go off on the deep end way too often, so I got tired of reading all the really stupid headlines to find the few good ones they had. Besides, most of the good stuff is not original and can be had somewhere else. When they do have something good that's original, it always gets spread around enough.

"I always wanted to be the hero of all squirrels; I just thought it'd never happen" - Quack

#256605

By Rockthejungle - May 1st, 2009, 11:01 pm

- May 1st, 2009, 11:01 pm #256605

Ed Dantes wrote:
Rockthejungle wrote:
LUconn wrote:for as many "good" articles that they have, they have some real crackpots with crazy conspiracy theories.
Who are the crackpots?I'm just wondering.
It rhymes with "Matt Muchanan."

..I'm not a fan of his either.