edited because other video was removed from youtube.
Posted: March 25th, 2009, 3:37 pm
by sweetnahmah1
so goooood
Re: Where the Wild Things Are
Posted: March 25th, 2009, 3:56 pm
by blwall1416
LUconn wrote:Everybody's favorite book as a kid.
This is a book???
Posted: March 25th, 2009, 4:08 pm
by RubberMallet
eh...cash grab
Posted: March 25th, 2009, 4:08 pm
by Rooster Cogburn
My favorite book of all time. I can't wait now, thanks LUConn
Posted: March 25th, 2009, 4:19 pm
by mrmacphisto
This is the kind of kids' movie the industry seems to have largely overlooked since the '80s (with few exceptions, including the new Narnia films). I'm looking forward to this.
Posted: March 25th, 2009, 5:46 pm
by Hold My Own
Is this the sequel to wild things?
Posted: March 25th, 2009, 7:01 pm
by mrmacphisto
It's more of a reboot, really.
Posted: March 25th, 2009, 9:43 pm
by RagingTireFire
I really wish they hadn't done that. This looks like a slightly better version of 'Shark Girl and Lava Boy'.
Just noticed that the director is Spike Jonez, the same guy who did 'Being John Malkovic' and 'Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind'. I predict that this movie will make no sense and tick me off.
Posted: March 26th, 2009, 2:46 am
by mrmacphisto
RagingTireFire wrote:I really wish they hadn't done that. This looks like a slightly better version of 'Shark Girl and Lava Boy'.
Shark Girl and Lava Boy was only slightly less than completely awesome?
Posted: March 26th, 2009, 8:49 am
by RagingTireFire
I showed the trailer to my wife and she had the same reaction. This looks like a movie for adults based on a children's book. In other words, both adults and children will be disappointed.
Posted: March 26th, 2009, 9:51 am
by Sly Fox
Sounds like Coraline without the nightmares for my kids but without much entertainment.
Posted: March 26th, 2009, 12:13 pm
by LUconn
I don't know guys. From that trailer, that looks like it's gonna be great. I think they used a lot of muppet-like costumes instead of CGI which I have been harping on for years (CGI hasn't been realistic looking since Jurassic Park and even they used a combination of CGI and robots.) The only thing that could be stupid is the story. Because the book is about 10 sentences and doesn't really have much of a story. I think this would be a hard one for anyone to screw up.
Posted: March 26th, 2009, 12:51 pm
by Rocketfan
LUconn wrote: (CGI hasn't been realistic looking since Jurassic Park and even they used a combination of CGI and robots.)
yea and you think about how old that movie is now.....so far ahead of its time...