Page 1 of 1

Obama and sex ed for your wee ones

Posted: September 15th, 2008, 11:39 am
by ALUmnus
This is what Obama supported for Sex Ed, with the KINDERGARTEN material highlighted in this piece. All Kindergarten topics are Level 1, and isn't far off from what we were going over in high school. This is getting sick.

http://amyproctor.squarespace.com/blog/ ... artne.html

Posted: September 15th, 2008, 11:43 am
by Fumblerooskies
Words that should NEVER be used in a title...
"Sex"
"Wee ones"

Posted: September 15th, 2008, 12:19 pm
by Ed Dantes
It's not what you think. Obama supports 'age-appropriate' sex education. It's not like he's pushing legislation that'll teach a five-year old how to put on a condom.

Posted: September 15th, 2008, 12:58 pm
by LUconn
But according to that curriculum, it does teach what a condom is. I'm in my mid 20s and I still giggled at half the things listed there. I'm sure a 6 year old can handle information like:

Bodies can feel good when touched.

Masturbation should be done in a private place.

Subconcept: Individuals express their sexuality with a partner in diverse ways.
If RubberMallet were to author his biography, that would be 90% of it.

Posted: September 15th, 2008, 1:11 pm
by ALUmnus
Ed Dantes wrote:It's not what you think. Obama supports 'age-appropriate' sex education. It's not like he's pushing legislation that'll teach a five-year old how to put on a condom.
No, you're right, they might wait until they're seven to break out the bananas. Did you read the curriculum? What are they going to be doing by the time they reach high school, how to navigate porn on the web? Public school rocks!

Posted: September 15th, 2008, 1:13 pm
by HenryGale
Fumblerooskies wrote:Words that should NEVER be used in a title...
"Sex"
"Wee ones"
Insert Michael Jackson joke here...

Posted: September 15th, 2008, 2:09 pm
by Schfourteenteen

Posted: September 15th, 2008, 2:10 pm
by Schfourteenteen
Image

Posted: September 15th, 2008, 2:57 pm
by Rocketfan
LUconn wrote:But according to that curriculum, it does teach what a condom is. I'm in my mid 20s and I still giggled at half the things listed there. I'm sure a 6 year old can handle information like:

Bodies can feel good when touched.

Masturbation should be done in a private place.

Subconcept: Individuals express their sexuality with a partner in diverse ways.
If RubberMallet were to author his biography, that would be 90% of it.
That could be a best seller......

Posted: September 15th, 2008, 3:08 pm
by JDUB
Ed Dantes wrote:It's not what you think. Obama supports 'age-appropriate' sex education. It's not like he's pushing legislation that'll teach a five-year old how to put on a condom.
closet obama supporter?? :brownbag

Posted: September 15th, 2008, 5:38 pm
by RubberMallet
LUconn wrote:But according to that curriculum, it does teach what a condom is. I'm in my mid 20s and I still giggled at half the things listed there. I'm sure a 6 year old can handle information like:

Bodies can feel good when touched.

Masturbation should be done in a private place.


Subconcept: Individuals express their sexuality with a partner in diverse ways.
If RubberMallet were to author his biography, that would be 90% of it.
oops

Posted: September 16th, 2008, 9:53 am
by Ed Dantes
JDUB wrote:
Ed Dantes wrote:It's not what you think. Obama supports 'age-appropriate' sex education. It's not like he's pushing legislation that'll teach a five-year old how to put on a condom.
closet obama supporter?? :brownbag
Actually, no...

I grew up in a Christian home, went to church, graduated from a Christian high school, did Liberty for four years, did two-years of post-grad work at another Christian school, and then went to work for a Christian ministry for the last few years... all that to say, it's easy for me to become inoculated in the Christian bubble. My friends are conservative, the people I know are conservative, I listen to conservative news... I am well aware of the fact that I am getting one-side of the story.

In this instance, I made my statement in the interests of fairness. I wanted to voice what the other side said, because I figured they were correct in this instance.

Boy, was I wrong. I looked at what that "Level I" curriculum teaches, after I made my original post, and it's just ridiculous.

Obama is a nothing more than a charismatic version of Karl Marx, and to put him in charge of anything is to put us all at risk.

Posted: September 16th, 2008, 12:12 pm
by Hold My Own
Ed Dantes wrote:
JDUB wrote:
Ed Dantes wrote:It's not what you think. Obama supports 'age-appropriate' sex education. It's not like he's pushing legislation that'll teach a five-year old how to put on a condom.
closet obama supporter?? :brownbag
Actually, no...

I grew up in a Christian home, went to church, graduated from a Christian high school, did Liberty for four years, did two-years of post-grad work at another Christian school, and then went to work for a Christian ministry for the last few years... all that to say, it's easy for me to become inoculated in the Christian bubble. My friends are conservative, the people I know are conservative, I listen to conservative news... I am well aware of the fact that I am getting one-side of the story.

In this instance, I made my statement in the interests of fairness. I wanted to voice what the other side said, because I figured they were correct in this instance.

Boy, was I wrong. I looked at what that "Level I" curriculum teaches, after I made my original post, and it's just ridiculous.

Obama is a nothing more than a charismatic version of Karl Marx, and to put him in charge of anything is to put us all at risk.


RUDY! RUDY! RUDY! RUDY! :lol:

Posted: September 16th, 2008, 8:39 pm
by 01LUGrad
Another interesting line from Topic 4: Sexuality and Religion:
Religions teach people how to love each other, how to behave, and what is right and wrong.
How the heck did that get into the sex ed curriculum?

By the way, Obama's vote for this legislation is one of the more compelling arguments not to vote for him.

Posted: September 17th, 2008, 4:10 pm
by Schfourteenteen
Except one thing.

On the government website it doesnt say he sponsored the bill

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillSta ... =&Session=

Is it possible for his name to not be on there and yet he voted yea for it?

Posted: September 17th, 2008, 10:37 pm
by 01LUGrad
Good catch. He probably voted "present."

Posted: September 17th, 2008, 10:48 pm
by Schfourteenteen
I hate politics