Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
LUconn wrote:I just switched from Alltel to Verizon in November and to do so, I had to give up my Alltel number. Does this mean if I had only held out I could have ported it? Verizon didn't have access to 434 numbers as of a month ago.haha
SuperJon wrote: I love dc Talk.
SuperJon wrote:If you look at the date when I originally posted that, they weren't digital.You mean they didn't have 3G (EVDO) coverage.
LUconn wrote:Isn't what they have here not 3G?Yes...Alltel has EVDO in our area...the Richmond area has EVDO-RevA...which is a much faster data connection.
El Scorcho wrote:SuperJon wrote:If you look at the date when I originally posted that, they weren't digital.You mean they didn't have 3G (EVDO) coverage.
All wireless phones have been using digital signals for a while now.
Geez.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Fumblerooskies wrote:3Mb versus 1.5Mb, both of which are theoretical maximums. It varies so wildly with wireless signals that I rarely notice the difference.LUconn wrote:Isn't what they have here not 3G?Yes...Alltel has EVDO in our area...the Richmond area has EVDO-RevA...which is a much faster data connection.
JMUDukes wrote:Sprint user here.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
El Scorcho wrote:I could tell a significant difference between the EVDO here in town and the Rev-A in Richmond.Fumblerooskies wrote:3Mb versus 1.5Mb, both of which are theoretical maximums. It varies so wildly with wireless signals that I rarely notice the difference.LUconn wrote:Isn't what they have here not 3G?Yes...Alltel has EVDO in our area...the Richmond area has EVDO-RevA...which is a much faster data connection.
Both were always plenty fast enough for me.
Hold My Own wrote:honestly i hate Sprint. crappy service.JMUDukes wrote:Sprint user here.
If you have a phone that allows roam only then use that...I used that on my Treo and would connect to my computer using it as a modem using the Altell towers....but shhhhhh
Fumblerooskies wrote:Seriously. It's like dialup vs a lower end broadband.El Scorcho wrote:I could tell a significant difference between the EVDO here in town and the Rev-A in Richmond.Fumblerooskies wrote: Yes...Alltel has EVDO in our area...the Richmond area has EVDO-RevA...which is a much faster data connection.3Mb versus 1.5Mb, both of which are theoretical maximums. It varies so wildly with wireless signals that I rarely notice the difference.
Both were always plenty fast enough for me.
LUconn wrote:Something must have changed then. Alltel's EVDO was always pretty darn fast in the 'burg when I had it. I had it from the time they turned it on until April of last year.Fumblerooskies wrote:Seriously. It's like dialup vs a lower end broadband.El Scorcho wrote: 3Mb versus 1.5Mb, both of which are theoretical maximums. It varies so wildly with wireless signals that I rarely notice the difference.I could tell a significant difference between the EVDO here in town and the Rev-A in Richmond.
Both were always plenty fast enough for me.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
SuperJon wrote: I love dc Talk.
AT&T’s mobile phone and data subsidiary today announced plans to add new cell sites along U.S. 29 between Lynchburg and Charlottesville this year.http://www.newsadvance.com/lna/business ... lle/13123/
Currently, AT&T mobile phones going north on that corridor lose coverage just north of Amherst, picking up service in a few other spots between there and Charlottesville.
AT&T Mobility also announced plans to upgrade its Lynchburg-area network to its third generation (3G) high-speed data technology. This would allow AT&T customers to use Internet and other data services on their phones or on laptops equipped with AT&T wireless cards faster than AT&T’s current technology allows in Lynchburg. Typical download speeds using the laptop cards range between 700kbps and 1.7 mbps, according to Ellen Webner, AT&T spokeswoman.
LUconn wrote:Didn't see that one coming. That was the main reason I didn't go for the BB bold.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.