If anyone read Bill O'Reilly's column today (available at
http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/oreilly030507.php3)...
Now say what you want about Bill O'Reilly, but he brings up a good point.
Ted Haggard was skewered for having secret gay sex with someone else. It was everywhere in the mainstream media (and rightfully so, it was a huge story). After all, he was a prominent evangelical caught in a dirty act.
But shouldn't there be equal outrage (or at the very least, any outrage) when someone like the Virginia President of the American Civil Liberties Union gets caught with child pornography? Why isn't anyone covering that?
What's worse, Haggard taking drugs and having consensual gay sex (which is really bad) or this:
"Tierney [the former president of the VA ACLU] apparently told the feds that he paid for the child porn using a Paypal account and then downloaded images of prepubescent girls being violently raped onto CD-Rom disks, which the authorities seized in his home. One of the images Tierney was in possession of showed a little girl tied up and screaming while being violently raped."
...
Says O'Reilly:
"The truth is the committed left press in America is no longer interested in reporting the news. Anything that hinders a favorable view of the far left will be ignored; anything that advances liberal causes will be celebrated. News reporting today is largely about ideology and shaping the culture, not about informing the public."
"You won't have Nixon to kick around any more, because, gentlemen, this is my last press conference." - Richard Nixon
"You won't have Dantes to kick around any more, because, members of Flame Fans, this is my last post." - Ed Dantes