[adam42381]

It is also ironic you support the guy that ran on a platform of trying to prove Obama was born in Kenya.....that is about as looney as as 9/11 truthers.

Sarah Palin supported the same thing along with many other Republicans.

And they were candidates who pandered to the lunacy of their constituents.

[bradyfan]

It is also ironic you support the guy that ran on a platform of trying to prove Obama was born in Kenya.....that is about as looney as as 9/11 truthers.

Sarah Palin supported the same thing along with many other Republicans.

And they were candidates who pandered to the lunacy of their constituents.

Honestly, if this is the worst thing that he's supported, it doesn't say much. Paul voted against the Amber alert and Romney's religious beliefs are wack.

[jbock13]

Oh no! How could Paul vote against the Amber Alert! Ron Paul must want children to be kidnapped, raped, and murdered!

[bradyfan]

Oh no! How could Paul vote against the Amber Alert! Ron Paul must want children to be kidnapped, raped, and murdered!

Wouldn't be surprised if that's what he wants, to be honest.

[thepostman]

whoa really?? I mean I understand if you don't support the guy, but come on man, really!!!??

[bradyfan]

whoa really?? I mean I understand if you don't support the guy, but come on man, really!!!??

Yeahhhh, I was totes joking about that. But voting against the Amber alert is pretty nuts.

[Purple Haize]

I I could make one phone call tonight, and have a poll showing you why Trump could win by tomorrow afternoon. Just because you think you "know" politics doesn't mean anything until you are in politics.

Who have you advised?

.

These.
I'd like too see a copy of said poll.
Also, answer your specific question

I'll check back tomorrow to see the poll results

[jbock13]

Am I the only one who's amused that we must believe what the Democrats say about our candidates? Or Trump?

[bradyfan]

I I could make one phone call tonight, and have a poll showing you why Trump could win by tomorrow afternoon. Just because you think you "know" politics doesn't mean anything until you are in politics.

Who have you advised?

.

These.
I'd like too see a copy of said poll.
Also, answer your specific question

I'll check back tomorrow to see the poll results

Yeah, I could do that if I wanted to but I have no reason to want to. I'd only do something like that if someone paid me.

The point was that I could make it happen if I really wanted to.

[jbock13]

you can log on to phoneypollcreation.com and make a quick poll sweat.

[R i]

Speaking of political advisors, Does this board have posting advisors?

[bradyfan]

you can log on to phoneypollcreation.com and make a quick poll sweat.

That's the best you could do?

[jbock13]

you can log on to phoneypollcreation.com and make a quick poll sweat.

That's the best you could do?

I'm giving 50% effort. Some people you don't really try as hard to debate with. Like Haize, we disagree but we can learn from each other. Others, not so much.

[Purple Haize]

I I could make one phone call tonight, and have a poll showing you why Trump could win by tomorrow afternoon. Just because you think you "know" politics doesn't mean anything until you are in politics.

Who have you advised?

.

These.
I'd like too see a copy of said poll.
Also, answer your specific question

I'll check back tomorrow to see the poll results

Yeah, I could do that if I wanted to but I have no reason to want to. I'd only do something like that if someone paid me.

The point was that I could make it happen if I really wanted to.

You asked what I wanted proof of. I told you what I wanted proof of. You can not provide proof, only, 'I could if I wanted but I don't so I won't.'. Therefore your afore mentioned claims of credentials influence and political pull /power still are labeled

[bradyfan]

hahaha.

kid, that's like asking a millionaire to loan you $50,000 just to prove that he's a millionaire. Not gonna happen. I'll be happy to provide you with my credentials if you'd like. That's one thing but I'm not just going to run a poll to prove my credentials. For the right dollar amount, I will but I'm not doing that for free. So, if you'd really like to me to, I will but you're going to have to pay up. Heck pay me enough, I can have a poll done by next week showing you why (insert your candidate name here) will win the Roanoke Valley.

[jbock13]

[Purple Haize]

hahaha.

kid, that's like asking a millionaire to loan you $50,000 just to prove that he's a millionaire. Not gonna happen. I'll be happy to provide you with my credentials if you'd like. That's one thing but I'm not just going to run a poll to prove my credentials. For the right dollar amount, I will but I'm not doing that for free. So, if you'd really like to me to, I will but you're going to have to pay up. Heck pay me enough, I can have a poll done by next week showing you why (insert your candidate name here) will win the Roanoke Valley.

Or....
That's like saying your a millionaire and when some asks you to show them the money you say I didn't become a millionaire by giving things a way for free. Basically it proves nothing. You are the one saying you are mr insider and could run a poll with just one phone call. Now you are making excuses because you got caught. So either put up or shut up and until then your alleged credentials are simply:

[skywalker5291]

I agree with Haize total

Oh and on the fact of why Paul voted against the Amber Alert bill. That was bc of a little pork barrel that called for 120 million for public housing. I though you would know this sweat bc you are so connected with politics but I guess bashing Paul with no facts works well for you just like it does for CNN and Fox.

[Purple Haize]

I agree with Haize total

Oh and on the fact of why Paul voted against the Amber Alert bill. That was bc of a little pork barrel that called for 120 million for public housing. I though you would know this sweat bc you are so connected with politics but I guess bashing Paul with no facts works well for you just like it does for CNN and Fox.

Which is an example of why if he gets elected it will be difficult for him to govern. Obviously I'm not going to vote for him in the primary, but trust me, if he is the Republican nominee I will vote for him often without any hesitation.

[skywalker5291]

I agree with Haize total

Oh and on the fact of why Paul voted against the Amber Alert bill. That was bc of a little pork barrel that called for 120 million for public housing. I though you would know this sweat bc you are so connected with politics but I guess bashing Paul with no facts works well for you just like it does for CNN and Fox.

Which is an example of why if he gets elected it will be difficult for him to govern. Obviously I'm not going to vote for him in the primary, but trust me, if he is the Republican nominee I will vote for him often without any hesitation.

Thank you Haize for stating your opinion and not calling me a crazy. I really enjoy discussions with people that disagree with me but i hate when someone belittles me in a discussion. So thank you again.

[Purple Haize]

Just goes to show how bad a President I think Obama is if I think Ron Paul would do better
It does have to be a little disheartening though when your own guy says he can't see himself winning. ((Nightline). Not the best way to rally the troops.

[Purple Haize]

SWEAT insomnia has caused me to re read your posts. In one you said you could pick up the phone and commission a poll and have results the next day. Nut later you say that if ur paid to do one it will be a week. What the heck? I'll go with the free one since the service looks faster!

[bradyfan]

Haize - I could have a poll started by tomorrow (well Monday since today is a Saturday), it would take up to a week to finish.

hahaha.

kid, that's like asking a millionaire to loan you $50,000 just to prove that he's a millionaire. Not gonna happen. I'll be happy to provide you with my credentials if you'd like. That's one thing but I'm not just going to run a poll to prove my credentials. For the right dollar amount, I will but I'm not doing that for free. So, if you'd really like to me to, I will but you're going to have to pay up. Heck pay me enough, I can have a poll done by next week showing you why (insert your candidate name here) will win the Roanoke Valley.

Or....
That's like saying your a millionaire and when some asks you to show them the money you say I didn't become a millionaire by giving things a way for free. Basically it proves nothing. You are the one saying you are mr insider and could run a poll with just one phone call. Now you are making excuses because you got caught. So either put up or shut up and until then your alleged credentials are simply:

Are you honestly limiting my credibility to if I run a poll for you or not? No one in their right mind would run a poll for free. Even when I was a campaign manager for a guy who lived on welfare, I still charged for a poll. I said that I would prove my credentials if you want me to. Your the one limiting them down to if I run a poll for free. If you really want a poll, I've even said that I'll do it, if you pay me. I really don't think anyone in politics would run a poll for free. I'm not making excuses because I'll still do it. What credentials do you have by the way? Who have you worked for?

[Purple Haize]

And this is why we call

If I had money and inclination there are several reputable polling organizations I could use. You were the one who said you could pick up the phone tonite and have the results of a poll that would show Trump winning in the Roankoe Valley tomorrow. THEN you said you could commission a poll and have it skewed in such away to show anyone winning. You are the one claiming special insider status, not us.
So what does this tell us. Since ANYONE can work for a campaign and since ANYONE with money can commission a poll, your claims of being a top operative with super secret access are, you guessed it boys and girls..

[jbock13]

Dude, we're calling you out. We're calling your bluff. Just cut it out already.