[SuperJon]

I never said that we, as Christians, should disregard Leviticus. What I said was that using Leviticus in this debate is pointless and takes away your credibility. Unless you have the time to explain Levitical law and that there were three forms of Levitical law and which ones we are relevant today and all of the idiosyncrasies that come with it, it's pointless to even mention.

[jbock13]

The fact of the matter is, homosexuality was an unnatural relationship in the eyes of God in OT times, along with the many other forms of sexual relations listed in the passage in Leviticus. Likewise, in the NT we find plenty of passages that essentially reaffirm what was said in Leviticus, such as Romans 1:26-27 (I checked several Versions and they all say the same thing). Therefore, in my opinion, the passage in Leviticus is still relevant.

+1.

[Purple Haize]

The fact of the matter is, homosexuality was an unnatural relationship in the eyes of God in OT times, along with the many other forms of sexual relations listed in the passage in Leviticus. Likewise, in the NT we find plenty of passages that essentially reaffirm what was said in Leviticus, such as Romans 1:26-27 (I checked several Versions and they all say the same thing). Therefore, in my opinion, the passage in Leviticus is still relevant.

+1.

The original Hebrew and Greek?