- November 11th, 2011, 11:48 am
#364918
Purple Haize wrote:What do you have to say then to the fact that Paterno willingly allowed Sandusky to come to his practices and what not with children, after the school clearly stated he was not allowed on campus with children? Sure the rule is pretty hard to enforce, but the dude had the gall to come to PSU practices and other football functions in blatant defiance of the rule yet Paterno did nothing. Paterno turned a blind eye to the guy...flamehunter wrote:I would agree with you Haize except that I think in the time since that first incident, wouldn't he have followed up with those he reported it to? Wouldn't he have questioned why Sandusky was still walking around a free man and wouldn't he have wondered why Sandusky was still working with kids and bringing them on campus? I believe he probably turned a blind eye to it to protect the image of his program and school. And that was wrong, big time. And he carried the weight to make something happened if he thought it should have been done.That is also a possibility. He also could have assumed that since he was walking around and since he was not a member of his staff that things were resolved. Also, these are pretty horrific charges and it is just as easy to believe that he couldn't wrap his arms around it. Seeing him walk around it would be easier to believe that it was all a misunderstanding as opposed to a cover up in his mind.
I will agree that a small percentage of it was motivated by protecting the image of the school but that could also stem from the possibility of the damage to its image if the charges proved false. That is why, IMO, that AFTER reading the whole indictment he said he should have done more.
But he was not the one who molested those children and again IMO he was not the one enabling it to continue. He did what was reasonable to expect anyone to do.



- By LU Armchair coach
- By ECC29