- May 17th, 2017, 12:59 am
lynchburgwildcats wrote:Trump on record saying he fired Comey for investigating Trump/Russia. Now it's also ben revealed that Trump told Comey to drop the investigation into Flynn. This is obstruction of justice.
I would like you to show me the record of this statement and not something edited by your sources or the mainstream media(who have been exposed countless of time twisting topics for their narrative). Comey has stated a long time that there is no proof of Trump having any Relations to Russia and their leader. The news have repeatedly accused Trump of this but not showing any evidence of such claim. Stating that there are "intelligence" sources repeatedly doesn't prove that there is any credibility of such accusation. Also Flynn did not do anything wrong based on the fact that he wasn't even have a position in intelligence anymore and was going around meeting Russian officials. This isn't illegal or unconstitutional because the same people claiming this as obstruction to justice have dine the same thing while maintaining there positions as congressmen/women, sebators , etc. (Chuck Schumer, Nancy Polosi, etc.). These are also the same people who declare a few months(even weeks ago) that Comes had no credibility and should be fired since he was investigating their beloved Hillary(who should be in jail right now based on actual evidence of bleaching a server and containing national security documents on her private server). Not to mention her aide Huma who sent confidential information to her own email which was stored on her husband's laptop (with other things that needs no mentioning here). Of course that doesn't matter because the media didn't tell you that right?
P.S. Funny how the investigation comes up on Seth Rich's murder and how it was a cover up from the D.C. police and from his leakage of DNC corruption, this claim of Trump giving information to Russians is pushed at the same time. I'm sure no one is trying to destroy a reinvestigation on Seth Rich right? Let's continue making up allegations to give the masses a narrative of how Trump is a Russian agent. Let's be real, Putin didn't need to hack into anything because Hillary destroyed her chances by just all her crimes and other crimes of those she is connected to (her husband, Human Abedin, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, etc.). In order to get the focus on them they do what they do best which is accusing the opponent as a threat or traitor (WikiLeaks, Trump, Roger Stone, Drudge Report, Milo Yiannopoulos, etc.)
This whole entire post is L O L worthy. You sound just like a Trump mouthpiece. You work for Fox News or something? Guss you're just going to gloss over how Trump himself said he fired Comey for investigating the Russia stuff. I don't need a source for that, the man himself said it. But I guess that doesn't fit into your Fox News and Friends narrative.
Funny though that you can't go a post talking about Trump without bringing up Hillary. I'm not even a democrat or a Hillary supporter/voter. Get over her already. SAD!
Though I admire your loyalty. Hope you realize before it's too late when to abandon ship. Only way I see Trump making it through his 4-year term is if the Republicans don't continue to destroy their credibility and they are able to keep enough seats in Congress in 2018.
Firstly, thank you for just assuming that I'm a die hard Trump fan. I ask you to show evidence and your response is that (you) don't have to show me President Trump stating that he fired Comey because of Russian investigation because he said it? So you're not going to show me the proof of such action? Hmmm that's interesting. Secondly, thank you for assuming that I watch Fox News. It's called researching and looking at credible independent journalist who are not backed by corporate executives. Thirdly you have to bring up Hillary because these accusations of Trump/Putin started with her and her compadres. For months they've accused of Russian hacking and even had a recount in which Hillary lost votes during the process. Since that didn't work, they changed the narrative of Trump being a Russian agent who took their propaganda of calling Hillary and the media fake news. Funny thing is ive seen interviews of Trump calling mainstream reporters fake in the late 80's- onward so this isn't anything knew(if you have a monitor, cpu , a keyboard, a mouse and internet). I'm sorry that you believe the narrative and can't do some research. Stating that someone has committed crimes with no evidence from a prolonged investigation doesn't make someone guilty. Yet since the media is very biased and pro-left, they will continue this narrative because they know if they repeat this accusation (even with no proof) that eventually people will believe it without critically thinking or asking question. Clearly you are one of those individuals.
Orwell said it best:
"So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot."
Since you like assumptions, I'll let you know that I support some of Trump's policy while disliking other positions on his platform. I dislike key players in his administration because clearly they don't want to work together and are just as foolish as the left; mainly because they're neoconservatives and CFR members who have a different agenda. So Trump messed up by thinking he can bring both parties together when these folks are not on the same page. Again you quit to recognize how serious the incident of Seth Rich is and what information he had caused his own murder. Of course that doesn't matter because you have personal hatred for Trump and you'll consume anything that is against him with no actual evidence but just media and politician rhetoric. At first they hate Comey and want him gone even a few weeks ago, but now because Trump let him go, he is now important for continuing a dried investigation which still lack any evidence. Even the acting F.B.I Director disclaim what the media had claim of Trump's firing of Comey:
"McCabe also contradicted reports by the Washington Post and New York Times that Comey was fired just days after seeking more resources for that investigation, including more prosecutors, other personnel and funding."
You can read the entire article: http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/05/acting-fb ... Z4x2irO.99
P.S. you can laugh at whatever you like. That still doesn't change the truth even if you ignore it. Orwell said it best, "In a time of universal deceit- telling the truth is a revolutionary act." This will be my last response to you.