- January 6th, 2007, 11:10 am
#50702
I work for Pat, as a producer in the CBN (Christian Broadcasting Network) News organization. If you ever watch the 700 Club and you see one of our news anchors reading something with video overlayed on top of it, chances are that I did it.
In the lead-up to the fifth anniversary of 9/11, one of my co-workers put together a piece that detailed how we, as an organization, covered it. We played clips from our broadcast that day (which, coincidentally, featured a pre-scheduled interview with a terrorist expert. And also Orel Hershieser, but that's another note). In any event, one of the things that was played in that piece was a clip from Pat's Labor Day prayer gathering (a bi-annual get together of all CBN employees, the other happens during New Year's). In Pat's Labor Day prayer gathering (taped Sept. 3, 2001), he said that he thinks the coming year will bring mass chaos in some form, maybe a suitcase nuke or something. Eight days later, 9/11 happened.
(Pat also said in January 2003, and several times after that, that 'the Iraq War will be a disaster.' and that it will be bloody).
On the other hand, he also said that President Bush will have no problem getting his second-term agenda (such as social security reform) passed, and he's predicted nuclear attack since 1980.
Now, I think LUConn said it best when he said (and I'll paraphrase), "how come Pat says that his word is from the Lord, and then follows up with 'I have been wrong'. Well, did Pat hear from God, or not?"
Now, saying that I think 2007 will bring a terrorist attack isn't anything spectacular. There are people in the world who want to do that. 2006 brought terrorist attacks from Islamic jihadists in places across the globe, notably the Mumbai train bombings in India and several failed attacks -- like the plot to blow up airliners back in August, and the failed plans to blow up something in Miami, and later Chicago. It is not unreasonable to think that 2007 will bring more of the same... keeping in mind how inept our government is at taking care of disasters these days.
(Pat also said that our government will have no idea how to handle a crisis. I think we can agree that he's dead-on with that one).
But if he didn't hear from God (the joke going around between me and some of the people at work is that Pat got "God" and "the trailer for season 6 of 24" confused. One of his predictions of doom and gloom - multiple attacks in multiple cities, possibly millions dead - parallel the situation that Jack Bauer will face during the upcoming season of the critically-acclaimed drama, which starts again with a two-night, four hour premiere! Check your local listings.)
If he didn't hear from God... then why make the comments to begin with? He also said (and this isn't the part that is going to be reported anywhere) that 2007 will be a year of tremendous blessings and miracles, stories so amazing you won't believe your eyes...
And if he did hear from God, is it not his responsibility to warn the people? If God gives someone a specific word ("bad things will happen") isn't it the responsibility of Pat to try to tell people to repent and pray that such an instance won't take place?
Take a look at Jonah. He was a prophet, and he said that God will destroy Ninevah in 40 days. No "unless you guys do this". The people repented, and God had compassion on them so that he didn't destroy the lands. Ninevah's destruction didn't come (until 6th or 7th Century B.C., but Jonah was long gone by then. And Ninevah is still around, anyways).
In summation, if Pat heard from God, he's gotta say it. If he didn't, well, he should be more reserved with his comments. Either way, we should be praying for protection on our nation -- something that we should be doing irrespective of Pat's remarks.
"You won't have Nixon to kick around any more, because, gentlemen, this is my last press conference." - Richard Nixon
"You won't have Dantes to kick around any more, because, members of Flame Fans, this is my last post." - Ed Dantes