- February 11th, 2013, 11:24 am
#419850
I'm fascinated by Papal selection. Surprised he is stepping down, but lets discuss the top replacements. No, JLFJR is not eligible 
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
Purple Haize wrote:I'm fascinated by Papal selection. Surprised he is stepping down, but lets discuss the top replacements. No, JLFJR is not eligibleWhat about Jonathan?
SuperJon wrote:I nominate Jed Bartlet.Can you imagine Leo McGarry, Toby Zeigler or Josh Lyman in the Vatican?!
phoenix wrote:I think that folks "in the know" are surprised he's still in office. They looked at him as a "transitional pope" that could fix some problems and lead while the guy they really want in the office got more experience.Is this like hiring an interim coach?
Shoutout to all the LU armchair coach wannabes o[…]