- October 22nd, 2006, 4:28 pm
#36599
I hear what he's saying; I would put it this way, the low-cost space is quite an asset in this transitional second growth phase of LU**, yet kind of an albatross in the design area as somewhat of an "ugly" space that forces you to adapt your orginial architectural aesthetics to meet the space instead of adapting the space to fit your desired space/design site layout.
It's kind of like when you get that gift from your Grandma, it meets the need and your thankful for it because it definitely helps you, but it's not exactly in sync with your specific purpose/style of what you originally wanted.
The space is definitely an asset and was a fortuitous gift for the school; the space is kind of a hodge podge of stuff at the moment. But perhaps, in the future, if they can raise a considerable endowment, they can go back and revisit the design of the site/space and redevelop it in the third growth phase of the university to a more exacting aesthetic standard.
(**I would say that 1971-2001 was probably the first phase--the start-up burn phase of an organization, 2001-? would be that second phase in a business where they're in the catch 22 of needing the consumers' dollars to create the product, but then needing more product to meet the increased demands, and the third phase (stabilization phase) will be where they are out of survival mode [que endowment overature] and then can go back and retroactively examine the "practical use" areas and redevelop them up to aesthetic, institutional standards.)