- January 11th, 2009, 1:33 am
#224080
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Hold My Own wrote: I made a billion dollars working at a Quickie FoodsMust be quality food youre dishing out
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Hold My Own wrote:But in a sense this is like Wikipedia right? I could put that I made a billion dollars working at a Quickie Foods....right?Is that really how you think Wikipedia works?
El Scorcho wrote:other than being liberally slant like nobodies business.Hold My Own wrote:But in a sense this is like Wikipedia right? I could put that I made a billion dollars working at a Quickie Foods....right?Is that really how you think Wikipedia works?
JMUDukes wrote:Not true. Wikipedia demands sources be cited within a certain period of time or the text without source is flagged for deletion.El Scorcho wrote:other than being liberally slant like nobodies business.Hold My Own wrote:But in a sense this is like Wikipedia right? I could put that I made a billion dollars working at a Quickie Foods....right?Is that really how you think Wikipedia works?
of course his statement is an exaggeration, but if someone makes an article that no one else has any real knowledge on...they could get away with some lies.
El Scorcho wrote:JMUDukes wrote:Not true. Wikipedia demands sources be cited within a certain period of time or the text without source is flagged for deletion.El Scorcho wrote: Is that really how you think Wikipedia works?other than being liberally slant like nobodies business.
of course his statement is an exaggeration, but if someone makes an article that no one else has any real knowledge on...they could get away with some lies.
I'm not saying there's not bad info on Wikipedia. The editing and revision maintenance process takes time. During that time it's possible to find bad information. You just have to learn how to read the entries and not trust information without sources cited. It's not perfect, but the system they have in place does work fairly well.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Hold My Own wrote:It's still not wise to use it as a source on anything though. Better to just go with whatever source the information is linked to on there. Even if it is true, which makes your source work look and sound better: Wikipedia or The Journal on Insert Disease Name Here?El Scorcho wrote:JMUDukes wrote: other than being liberally slant like nobodies business.Not true. Wikipedia demands sources be cited within a certain period of time or the text without source is flagged for deletion.
of course his statement is an exaggeration, but if someone makes an article that no one else has any real knowledge on...they could get away with some lies.
I'm not saying there's not bad info on Wikipedia. The editing and revision maintenance process takes time. During that time it's possible to find bad information. You just have to learn how to read the entries and not trust information without sources cited. It's not perfect, but the system they have in place does work fairly well.
Yeah I was basically stating the stigma that they had from when they first started....although they have made leaps and bounds and have made it as to where you could actually use it for school work, as to 5 years ago that wasnt possible
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Oh absolutely—because apparently the Transfe[…]