- October 22nd, 2021, 7:23 pm
#633761
I’m not a lawyer, so what’s juicy about it? I saw The Baggett Lady© say the document suggests that it means the investigation was meant to be internal, not independent, but to my lay-person’s eyes it looks like it’s granting unlimited access to the investigators. My take was that he posted it to suggest that he can talk about whatever he wants.
Edit* or that he’s suggesting they fired him for being a whistleblower
Edit* or that he’s suggesting they fired him for being a whistleblower