- September 8th, 2015, 9:55 pm
#490952
Just saw that. I'm on my phone and the PDF isn't loading. Will take a look in the morning.
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
JLFJR wrote:...if the disclaimer is still included, it is not so that benefits already earned can be revoked. We have never done that and never would do that absent financial exigencies.The reality is, as a parent, I was there when LCA leadership explained how it worked. You weren't there and are making assumptions.
Purple Haize wrote:Good salesmen always try to accentuate the positive and down play the negative. I would be surprised if that was proactively brought up. If it was I'm sure it was minimalised because it had never been done before.My wife use to rant about the lack of missionary scholarships when we were in school she never understood why pastor kids got them but missionary kids did not. If course she did fairly well in school so was able to take advantage of some other scholarships that helped a great deal but as a missionary kid she couldn't quite understand that one.
I will say it would be nice if the scholarships for missionary kids would be addressed. I'm not sure of the particulars but if they were done away with that would be sad. I would think a school flush with as much cash as LU could work it out.
Yacht Rock wrote:Check out page 50 of this recent presentation used within the last few weeks. No disclaimer or mention of it ending after any given year.I would say this is misleading, at best. Sure, you should have read the fine print, but it's not a good look for LCA or LU.
http://www.lcabulldogs.com/media/9910/A ... tation.pdf
This page which was active as of last week stated
"A FULL Tuition Liberty University scholarship is given to every LCA student who attends from grades 3 - 12."
http://www.lcabulldogs.com/index.cfm?pid=19609
When we began enrolling our children into LCA in early 2013, this is the document we were provided.
http://www.lcabulldogs.com/media/9910/s ... arship.pdf
LUnpretty11 wrote:PH, your BJ skills impress me.
thepostman wrote:I hope so. Like I said I don't have any dog in the fight but to me that is sort of a core thing for a place like LUPurple Haize wrote:Good salesmen always try to accentuate the positive and down play the negative. I would be surprised if that was proactively brought up. If it was I'm sure it was minimalised because it had never been done before.My wife use to rant about the lack of missionary scholarships when we were in school she never understood why pastor kids got them but missionary kids did not. If course she did fairly well in school so was able to take advantage of some other scholarships that helped a great deal but as a missionary kid she couldn't quite understand that one.
I will say it would be nice if the scholarships for missionary kids would be addressed. I'm not sure of the particulars but if they were done away with that would be sad. I would think a school flush with as much cash as LU could work it out.
It was my understanding that they brought missionary scholarships back after we graduated in 2008 but I'm not certain about that.
thepostman wrote:So they do offer full scholarships now to missionary kids which is totally the right move but too bad for people like my wife. Maybe that's the ticket for YR, become a missionary!!!Or get a job at LU.
olldflame wrote:My wife has thought about it. I wouldn't be able to do it. I don't think LU can afford my particular set of skills.thepostman wrote:So they do offer full scholarships now to missionary kids which is totally the right move but too bad for people like my wife. Maybe that's the ticket for YR, become a missionary!!!Or get a job at LU.
thepostman wrote:So they do offer full scholarships now to missionary kids which is totally the right move but too bad for people like my wife. Maybe that's the ticket for YR, become a missionary!!!We've actually thought about that. Maybe someday.
olldflame wrote:I fully understand the reasoning behind LU reevaluating the way these funds have been allocated. The way things have been, it would appear that along with the many worthy and needy recipients, at a minimum hundreds of thousands of dollars annually may have been going to students who do not really need or deserve them simply because they attended certain schools, while other local students who may in fact be more deserving were not eligible.Yeah, if it was communicated that they were phasing these out, I would have a totally different opinion of the situation. And I agree, there are a lot of families that can afford both. Unfortunately, ours is not one of them.
However......... since this has been in the works for a few years, it looks to me like someone dropped the ball bigtime regarding the ongoing advertising of LU scholarships for students at these specific schools without a clear disclosure of plans to discontinue them. Could end up being a very costly mistake. On first glance, it looks to me like something should be done about this.
Sly Fox wrote:This is a really bad look for LCA. No getting around it. I'm not impacted directly like Yacht Rock but from my distant view, I don't place blame on LU in this case. I see this as LCA dropping the ball.But LU holds the purse strings
thepostman wrote:It just sucks that it was presented the way it was by LCA. it is just a bad look.This is the core of it all. This was a major fail on LCA's part.