Page 1 of 3

Libertycentric Blog Discussion

Posted: April 16th, 2009, 10:01 pm
by LUconn
that's awfully lazy of you not to read the other posts. Also, what's your problem with snow-flex?


edit: We're talking about this http://libertyfreelance.blogspot.com

Posted: April 16th, 2009, 10:12 pm
by SuperJon
LUconn wrote:that's awfully lazy of you not to read the other posts. Also, what's your problem with snow-flex?
Just another example of a Liberty kid not knowing what's going on and pretending to be edgy by going against the school.

Posted: April 16th, 2009, 10:15 pm
by rueful
its funny, his site makes it seem like eeeeveryone reads it, yet a bet a majority of the views he has came from the last few minutes with flamefans checking out his site to see who he thinks he is

Posted: April 16th, 2009, 10:17 pm
by SuperJon
It'll get blocked on campus. Guarantee it. They're not even posting from Lynchburg.

Posted: April 16th, 2009, 10:18 pm
by Hold My Own
Is it me or do they have a lot of N&A stuff in their blog and then there is the name. Obviously it's not Chris so I'm not implying that...just a lot of N&A content...that I find curious

Posted: April 16th, 2009, 10:21 pm
by rueful
SuperJon wrote:It'll get blocked on campus. Guarantee it. They're not even posting from Lynchburg.
it wont need to get blocked. no one has heard of it, and no one will. He will keep updating it for a month and get bored

Posted: April 16th, 2009, 10:24 pm
by El Scorcho
rueful wrote:its funny, his site makes it seem like eeeeveryone reads it.
Give it a couple of weeks and no one will be reading it.

Posted: April 16th, 2009, 10:26 pm
by ToTheLeft
LUconn wrote:that's awfully lazy of you not to read the other posts. Also, what's your problem with snow-flex?
I love how it's the same old argument, too.

"Couldn't the money have been spent on something more educational..."

What brand of ignorant "journalism" is that...

Posted: April 16th, 2009, 10:29 pm
by rueful
El Scorcho wrote:
rueful wrote:its funny, his site makes it seem like eeeeveryone reads it.
Give it a couple of weeks and no one will be reading it.
that was the irony of it. you dont need to give it a couple of weeks

Posted: April 16th, 2009, 10:32 pm
by ToTheLeft
El Scorcho wrote:
rueful wrote:its funny, his site makes it seem like eeeeveryone reads it.
Give me a couple of weeks and no one will be reading it.
When I read it at first, thats what I thought you had said... and I didn't really think twice about it, then I noticed it said it and I thought "well both statements would be true..."

Posted: April 16th, 2009, 10:40 pm
by El Scorcho
Oh it definitely won't be me that does something about it. Not my job. But I can safely predict that it'll get the ol' block in the back from LU if it's too critical.

Posted: April 16th, 2009, 10:59 pm
by LUconn
It actually seems positive for the most part but,
The Liberty Freelance is an independent source reporting news and opinions relating to Liberty University. We believe a vibrant and open and independent conversation is necessary for Liberty to progress.
Come on. That sounds dramatic and all but it doesn't really mean anything. Progress to what? How is a bunch of people who don't matter, vibrantly discussing LU gonna do anything? That's pretty much us. And we're not really changing the world here. Except for me of course. I make things happen.

Posted: April 17th, 2009, 7:00 am
by Liberty Freelance
Wow! Take it easy, fellas. That would be to Liberty's everlasting embarrassment if they ban websites for being even semi-critical. But the potential that it might be banned is an insufficient rationale for not reading it in the first place, or for writing it off.


My problem with the ski slope is that it makes LU look like a summer camp. Perhaps there's nothing wrong with it. I just think that when your academics aren't what they could be, and you have one of the highest admission percentages in the country, you could allocate that money to something, say, academic.

Posted: April 17th, 2009, 7:44 am
by SuperJon
And I think you need to pay attention to what's been said by Jerry Jr and the administration in regards to academics and the ski slope.

You also need to learn some Liberty history to know how websites like yours have been over the years.

Posted: April 17th, 2009, 7:52 am
by Liberty Freelance
What are you so defensive about? I'm sorry if I don't have the information that Jerry Jr. provided you. Perhaps you'd like to update me on your first-hand accounts? Seriously.

Also, I don't even know what your last sentence means. How many websites there have been? Doing a simple Google search, there's not much out there by students or alumni. So a blog, unshackled from Liberty's administration, reporting on the news is essential. Do you disagree? If so, perhaps we can have a calm discussion about it.

Posted: April 17th, 2009, 8:04 am
by Ed Dantes
Liberty Freelance wrote: Also, I don't even know what your last sentence means. How many websites there have been? Doing a simple Google search, there's not much out there by students or alumni. So a blog, unshackled from Liberty's administration, reporting on the news is essential. Do you disagree? If so, perhaps we can have a calm discussion about it.
Yeah. You totally don't know history.

There's a REASON why there are no sites like yours giving the 'behind the scenes' look at Liberty. Go do a google search for 'the truth at LU'. (actually, that one is still up -- and hasn't been updated in over six years)

FlameFans -- dating back to its predecessor at proboards -- took a while to take off because everyone thought it was inevitable that this site was going to be banned by Liberty.

The reason why FlameFans is successful is because it's an open forum, and that people are able to clear the record when there is a problem. Falwell has posted on here. Coaches have posted on here. It's not supposed to be a 'look at the misappropriation of funds that Liberty is guilty of' board. And I'm not saying that's your modus operandi -- I'm just saying you tread on thin ice.

Posted: April 17th, 2009, 8:10 am
by Liberty Freelance
Given that history, we should be just fine. For our blog is not dedicated to misappropriation of funds either. But we're not going to shy away from criticism. Many people seem to think that labeling something "negative" is a legitimate reason to write it off. Of course, it's not. And the arguments and points must be met and debated on their merits. And that's the point of our blog. It's a free-speech zone--something that's unfortunately lacking at many evangelical institutions.

Thanks for the cite to "the truth at LU." I'll check it out.

Forgive me if I can't keep up with the follow-up messages for a few hours. I have to head off to my day job.

Take it easy.

Posted: April 17th, 2009, 8:10 am
by SuperJon
Liberty Freelance wrote:What are you so defensive about? I'm sorry if I don't have the information that Jerry Jr. provided you. Perhaps you'd like to update me on your first-hand accounts? Seriously.
I just can't stand stupid people who don't even read the newspaper. If you did, you would've seen articles where Jerry Jr specifically talked about admission standards and academics.


People wonder how the members of FlameFans know so much. The biggest thing: we read the newspaper.

Posted: April 17th, 2009, 8:13 am
by Liberty Freelance
One more thing: since some people here are apparently sensitive to the ski-slope issue, instead of calling me an idiot, why don't you craft a rational argument defending the ski slope, and we'd love to post it. Think it over. But we believe that a rational discussion that doesn't stifle anyone's point of view is more effective and educational than pedestrian name-calling.

Posted: April 17th, 2009, 8:14 am
by SuperJon
Liberty Freelance wrote:One more thing: since some people here are apparently sensitive to the ski-slope issue, instead of calling me an idiot, why don't you craft a rational argument defending the ski slope, and we'd love to post it. Think it over. But we believe that a rational discussion that doesn't stifle anyone's point of view is more effective and educational than pedestrian name-calling.
BuryYourDuke wrote:I'm sure some of you are intelligent enough to know this, but the ski slope was totally a random donation thing. They didn't donate general dollars, they donated the ski slope. I'm sure the administration would have rather had a new academic building, but you don't look a gift horse in the mouth, as they say.
Way to read there big guy.

Posted: April 17th, 2009, 8:16 am
by Liberty Freelance
If you want to send an argument, though, it must be an argument. We won't publish childish temper tantrums in which you refer to people who hold a different point of view as "stupid people." But we'd love to publish thoughtful arguments encouraging people to get more information to support their points of view.

Posted: April 17th, 2009, 8:19 am
by Liberty Freelance
SuperJon, I don't know what you're so threatened by. But I was referring to sending us an argument that we post on our blog, not posting under a thread about a Liberty basketball player where no one interested in a debate about a ski slope would know to look for it.

Posted: April 17th, 2009, 8:43 am
by Rooster Cogburn
Should I bring my amazing Liberty HOMER powers to this thread now. Dude, please shoo!

Posted: April 17th, 2009, 8:47 am
by BUSIMAN23
Is it that time of the month? You veteran flames fans get a little too upset when people go against what you think, ex: calling people stupid for not reading the newspaper, and tend to act a little pompous because you have been posting at this most important site for years and years.

Posted: April 17th, 2009, 9:10 am
by soccer7
:offtopic

I was looking for more on Brolin but since I had to read through all this other mess I wam going to put my .02 cents in. I love the simple fact that the people that criticize LU and other people that comment or make decision at the school can not take criticism from others on what they say. Call me silly but if you cant take the criticism then dont dish it out.