Interesting read this AM. By the way, I love Staver's last line:
“These school districts responding puts pressure on the other school districts to respond,” Staver said. “It weakens the alliance.”
Alliance? What's next, quotes about an evil empire? Is he leading a rebellion of some sort. I just wish the publics would schedule LCA and tear them a new one--then they would see why they need to stay put.
http://www.newsadvance.com/servlet/Sate ... 4241&path=
Attorney: There is no boycott
By Ron Brown
rbrown@newsadvance.com
May 27, 2006
A lawyer for school districts in Appomattox, Campbell and Bedford counties on Friday rejected Liberty Christian Academy’s claim that the public schools were illegally refusing to schedule games against LCA athletic teams.
Liberty Counsel President Mat Staver made the charge of an illegal boycott in a May 16 letter written to eight public school districts.
In that letter, Staver threatened to sue if the boycott continued.
“Upon receiving your letter of May 16, 2006, our firm investigated your claim that these school systems had engaged in an illegal boycott,” wrote attorney Frank A. Wright Jr. in a letter faxed to Staver on Friday. “None of the school systems we represent have participated in any illegal boycott, nor have they violated any state or federal laws in scheduling athletic competition.”
Wright is a partner in the Rustburg firm of Overbey, Hawkins, Selz and Wright.
Staver’s letter also claimed school districts in Nelson, Prince Edward, Pittsylvania and Amherst counties and Lynchburg were participating in the boycott.
Pittsylvania County school officials previously denied boycotting LCA.
School districts in Amherst, Nelson and Prince Edward counties and Lynchburg have not responded to Staver’s letter.
“Appomattox, Bedford and Campbell Public Schools will continue to consider all options when scheduling athletic opportunities, including the option of scheduling competitions with Lynchburg Christian Academy,” Wright’s letter said. “Please understand that Lynchburg Christian Academy will not be given more or less priority in scheduling over other schools because you have threatened to sue.”
Last year, the name of LCA was formally changed to Liberty Christian Academy.
Wright provided a synopsis of how schools determine potential opponents for their athletic teams.
First, the school looks to teams within their district before looking at non-district opponents, he said.
Non-district opponents are selected based on mutually available dates and whether the competition would be fair. A game’s effect on strength of schedule is also taken into consideration.
“Because of these factors, a team may play completely different non-district teams each year,” Wright wrote.
“Our local schools, public and private, have enjoyed a positive relationship over the years. I regret that your client believed it necessary to retain an attorney and send a letter threatening legal action without first contacting our school system’s administrators informally to discuss their concerns.”
E.C. Glass athletic director Chip Berry said earlier this month that Glass has excluded LCA in its athletic scheduling, as have some Seminole District schools, due to conflicting rules of operation used by the public schools and private schools.
“I know the Seminole schools have said they don’t want to play them, (though) I don’t know that the whole district as a district has come together and said they won’t play LCA,” Berry said. “The key thing is the different set of rules that the schools play by.”
In early February, LCA applied to become a member of the Virginia High School League (VHSL), stating it was required by law to open its membership to non-public schools. That request was denied, but the school plans to continue to pursue that case in the future.
Staver said that LCA officials would begin contacting schools next week to see if games can be scheduled.
“These school districts responding puts pressure on the other school districts to respond,” Staver said. “It weakens the alliance.”