My systems analysis class has me convinced that I will never, never take a job as a systems analyst.
Anyway… After spending entirely too much time scrutinizing JFJR's Master Plan pics, I've altered the Champion Circle diagram from the Fall 2013 plan to match the model (as closely as I can without 360-degree closeups of the model).
I’ve made a couple observations about the six additional dorms being planned around the two Commons towers. It's a little long-winded, so I'd say only those who really enjoy speculation about the Master Plan will care to read it. But here goes...
VMDO recently updated a
document on the Jerry Falwell Library with more specifics about their overall planning efforts. The Landmark Tower is mentioned, along with a “new 3,500 bed residential quad.” It’s possible that this is referring to the new buildings we’re seeing down on South Campus, but as a university official recently went
on record saying there would be no immediate major construction on South Campus, I believe this is referring to the smaller dorms in the Commons project, and I don’t think the figure includes the two towers. VMDO has barely acknowledged the Mitchell/Matthews project to date, so I think the number is referring only to VMDO’s plans. Not to mention, if that figure did include the towers, then VMDO’s smaller dorms would be only about 180 students per building, which IMHO doesn’t look like enough for their size. (The Hill dorms look much smaller in the model, and they hold around 200.)
So let’s do the math. Six buildings holding 3,500 students comes out to about 580 students per building. If the buildings are four stories tall to match the other VMDO projects, that’s about 145 students per floor (the exact number is probably even, not odd). Assuming the university is going to stick with its long-time goal of returning to 2-bed rooms as standard, that’s about 72 rooms. That’s double the size of a current residence hall, even in Commons I. Unless Liberty is secretly planning a massive overhaul of dorm structure and student leadership (which seems like wishful thinking), that’s way too big to be manageable, which means we’re looking at two halls per floor, probably with the elevators in the middle as they are in the towers.
Assuming, of course, that we're still looking at quasi-traditional residence halls, which seems likely as JFJR dissed the apartment/suite-style dorm concept
after these buildings were first pictured.
Regardless of the above paragraphs, close examination of the model indicates that there is a connection between the two southwestern buildings (upper left on my diagram). The lakeside dining facility connects the two northwestern buildings (upper right). Therefore, since it can’t be seen clearly in the pictures we have from the model, I went ahead and assumed that the two eastern buildings (lower center) have a similar feature. I assume these connectors are some sort of common area between the two buildings, though I could only guess as to their function. It’s possible that what we’re seeing as six buildings are actually three buildings, each with two wings. Since from what I’ve seen, the concept of a coed common area has been a massive hit, it’s possible that one wing will be male and one female, like the towers. It’s also possible that, if there are indeed two halls per floor in each wing, the wings themselves will be split between one male hall and one female hall. Either would be consistent with Liberty’s current housing philosophy, which allows men and women to live within the same physical building as long as the halls themselves are separately secured and visitation is not allowed.
*Whew* … that was long. Now back to
