Wow....
Posted: August 8th, 2008, 10:51 pm
https://forums.aseaofred.com/forums/
https://forums.aseaofred.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=9905
JK37 wrote:I like her so much more than Shawn Johnson. Her uneven routine truly is something else, and her floorroutine has more attitude than Johnson's. Johnson is too all-american girly to me, and Liukin displays greater maturity, competitiveness, and attitude in all of her routines.That was the most intense description of a gymnastics routine that I've ever heard...NBC should be calling soon.
TDDance234 wrote:They'd only be interested if my last name were Costas, or I spoke as broken English as Karolyi.JK37 wrote:I like her so much more than Shawn Johnson. Her uneven routine truly is something else, and her floorroutine has more attitude than Johnson's. Johnson is too all-american girly to me, and Liukin displays greater maturity, competitiveness, and attitude in all of her routines.That was the most intense description of a gymnastics routine that I've ever heard...NBC should be calling soon.
flamesbball84 wrote:already 18? shes getting old for that sport, normally they aren't even close to 18 years old.Time for an update shuck. That would have been semi-accurate 10 years ago, but gymnasts are now not allowed to compete in the olympics before their 16th birthday. Right now the Chinese team is suspected of having as many as 3 of their 6 girls underage, with falsified passports. The head of the gymnastics federation is blowing it off because it would be a huge mess if they were disqualified.
olldflame wrote:Yawnflamesbball84 wrote:
BTW, after the preliminaries of the all-around, Nastia is second, behind Shawn Johnson, with a Chinese girl 3rd.
flamesbball84 wrote: YawnNot a fan capable of appreciation. Just a thrill-seeker whose only wish is to be entertained. Sad...
JK37 wrote:i've been watching a lot of field hockey, that's not exactly a "thrill-seeker" sport. what a sad assumption by you.flamesbball84 wrote: YawnNot a fan capable of appreciation. Just a thrill-seeker whose only wish is to be entertained. Sad...
flamesbball84 wrote:so, why do you yawn at gymnastics?JK37 wrote:i've been watching a lot of field hockey, that's not exactly a "thrill-seeker" sport. what a sad assumption by you.flamesbball84 wrote: YawnNot a fan capable of appreciation. Just a thrill-seeker whose only wish is to be entertained. Sad...
JK37 wrote:it's boring. i dont quite know how to explain why i think it's boring, but i think it's boring.flamesbball84 wrote:so, why do you yawn at gymnastics?JK37 wrote: Not a fan capable of appreciation. Just a thrill-seeker whose only wish is to be entertained. Sad...i've been watching a lot of field hockey, that's not exactly a "thrill-seeker" sport. what a sad assumption by you.
JK37 wrote:yeah, there's no doubt its suspicious, at the very least. However, the release combination that the one chinese girl nailed at the beginning of her bars routine (before falling off the transition to the low bar - ouch!) is one of the best singular moves I've seen on bars in a loooong time. Breathtaking!i actually elected to not wath the crap on the internet anymore. they dont have commentators for the stuff on the internet (even if the games is broadcasted on tv they dont hve commentators on the internet) and its extremely hard to get into even a basketball game when all you can hear is the faint noise of the crows, very faint unless your turn you speakers all the way up. it's just not very entertaining to watch the stuff online with no commentary and i have to say nbc really dropped the ball with the webcasts as far as i'm concerned.
I applaud you for keeping the TV/Internet on, even if all there was to watch was gymnastics!
flamesbball84 wrote:i actually elected to not wath the crap on the internet anymore. they dont have commentators for the stuff on the internet (even if the games is broadcasted on tv they dont hve commentators on the internet) and its extremely hard to get into even a basketball game when all you can hear is the faint noise of the crows, very faint unless your turn you speakers all the way up. it's just not very entertaining to watch the stuff online with no commentary and i have to say nbc really dropped the ball with the webcasts as far as i'm concerned.There you go with that word. Isn't the sport itself ever enough?
JK37 wrote:not if i'm at home watching the game by myself and don't know who anyone is in any sport other than the notable names like Phelps and Walsh, for example. silent games dont provide much of an atmosphere, and if i'm not familiar with the sport (like water polo), how am i going to learn the rules and terminology? sure i can do research online, but it's a heck of a lot easier to wsee it demonstrated in person than trying to have to convey text into imagery. it would be like going to an LU football game where the fans never cheered or anything, that would make the game a lot less entertaining.flamesbball84 wrote:i actually elected to not wath the crap on the internet anymore. they dont have commentators for the stuff on the internet (even if the games is broadcasted on tv they dont hve commentators on the internet) and its extremely hard to get into even a basketball game when all you can hear is the faint noise of the crows, very faint unless your turn you speakers all the way up. it's just not very entertaining to watch the stuff online with no commentary and i have to say nbc really dropped the ball with the webcasts as far as i'm concerned.There you go with that word. Isn't the sport itself ever enough?
flamesbball84 wrote: it would be like going to an LU football game where the fans never cheered or anything, that would make the game a lot less entertaining.Kinda like going to an LC football game every week, right?
flamesbball84 wrote:it would be like going to an LU football game where the fans never cheered or anything, that would make the game a lot less entertaining.I'm just happy that you're differentiating between sport and entertainment.