Page 1 of 1
They took it too far...
Posted: February 11th, 2008, 2:23 pm
by Ed Dantes
In the aftermath of the Dana Jacobson and Chris Berman situations, one Christian group is protesting ESPN...
It is the goal of the Christian Defense Coalition to help ESPN realize the negative use of "Jesus Christ" and "Goddamn" in the workplace is as offense and hateful as using the term "nigger" in the workplace....
"Corporate America must begin to understand that terms like 'Goddamn' and the negative use of 'Jesus Christ' in the workplace are no different than using expressions like 'faggot' or 'nigger' in the workplace.
Look, give the girl a suspension and get on with it. I'm a Christian and saying "nigger" is a heck of a lot worse than saying "Jesus Christ".
Posted: February 11th, 2008, 3:18 pm
by RubberMallet
stupid faggots
Posted: February 11th, 2008, 5:18 pm
by pbow
they're clearly a bunch of idiots
Posted: February 11th, 2008, 5:39 pm
by kel varson
I probably wouldn't protest it, but if I owned a business myself I would crack down on the use of racial epithets, cursing and so forth. I find all of it offensive, but that's what society has become.
Posted: February 11th, 2008, 6:39 pm
by adam42381
Isn't the meaning of goddamn the same as dang? Both were used when asking God to condemn something to hell or to pass judgment, right? I don't understand why it's considered so much more offensive. I think people misinterpret it as damning God when in fact it is asking God to pass judgment on a particular thing. Granted, neither dang nor goddamn are commonly used in this way anymore but I believe that's where the origin is. Anybody want to clear this up?
Posted: February 11th, 2008, 8:10 pm
by whmatthews
I see it as blasphemy - using God's name as a swear word.
Re: They took it too far...
Posted: February 12th, 2008, 12:13 pm
by blwall1416
Ed Dantes wrote:...heck of a lot worse than saying "Jesus Christ".
Yes, but what about "Jesus H. Christ"....?
This guy needs to know:

Re: They took it too far...
Posted: February 12th, 2008, 12:44 pm
by RagingTireFire
blwall1416 wrote:
Yes, but what about "Jesus H. Christ"....?
This guy needs to know:
I want to know what the "H" is supposed to stand for. Since He took all human sufferings of man upon Himself, did Our Savior also have an embarassing middle name?
Re: They took it too far...
Posted: February 12th, 2008, 12:46 pm
by blwall1416
RagingTireFire wrote:I want to know what the "H" is supposed to stand for.
I'm not sure either. We'll have to ask SGT. Hartman.
Posted: February 12th, 2008, 12:48 pm
by jcmanson
I've always assumed it was Holy
Posted: February 12th, 2008, 1:04 pm
by RubberMallet
Posted: February 12th, 2008, 1:09 pm
by kiltsareitchy07
I don't even know why an organization called the Christian Defense Coalition exists. Jesus TOLD his disciples and those who thought about becoming disciples what they would be getting into. God in his three persons IS the Christian defense coalition. The psalms tell us that the mouths of the scoffers will be stopped, so why get riled up about it? Such "advocacy" groups are pointless and their incessant protests of everything from Disneyland to ESPN to Harry Potter make all of us look terrible. While I think that God's name is used too frequently, thus degrading its holiness, or separateness, I think getting riled up and calling for protests when pagans profane it is a little unnecessary. I bet the CDC won't ever call for a protest or boycott against a business run by a Christian who profanes God's name, so there's obviously a double standard.
Seriously, though, I have a ton of respect for the way Jews keep God's name holy. They won't even say YHWH, but instead say Adon [Lord] or, even better, Ha'shem [the Name]. I think that should be an example to all of us.
Posted: February 12th, 2008, 1:56 pm
by HenryGale
RubberMallet wrote:http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_033.html
It's amazing the things you can learn on FlameFans
Posted: February 12th, 2008, 2:23 pm
by RagingTireFire
I like to think it stands for "Happy".
