Page 1 of 1
Schilling responds to questions about "The Bloody Sock&
Posted: April 27th, 2007, 3:15 pm
by Libertine
Paragraphs 7 & 10 are very interesting. I had no idea.
http://38pitches.com/2007/04/27/ignoran ... rivileges/
Posted: April 27th, 2007, 3:28 pm
by LUconn
This is one of the best articles I've ever read. I can understand why the media hates Schilling. He just owned them.
Posted: April 27th, 2007, 3:42 pm
by Hold My Own
LUconn wrote:He just owned them.
It's lines like these that keep me coming back for more
Posted: April 27th, 2007, 5:49 pm
by TallyW
I'm glad he's clearing his name... that could have been bad for LU since we named a building after him and all...
Posted: April 27th, 2007, 7:19 pm
by ALUmnus
I don't watch around the horn or pti anymore because I don't get home in time, but don't be surprised to see the most biased attack come about on Schilling for this. Curt is totally correct in just about everything he says in this, I loved it. Now let's watch the media circle the wagons and shift to attack mode.
Posted: April 27th, 2007, 7:21 pm
by SuperJon
They didn't mention it at all.
Posted: April 27th, 2007, 10:47 pm
by SumItUp
TallyW wrote:I'm glad he's clearing his name... that could have been bad for LU since we named a building after him and all...
Posted: April 28th, 2007, 4:05 am
by PeterParker
On a related front, just got back from watching the Red Sox 'own' the
Oreos at Camden the last couple of days. (Disclaimer: All games were played sans bloody socks.)
This is a great week, especially in light of tonight's result in the Bronx.
