ballcoach15 wrote:When hiring a coach, hire the best one you can get. Truth be known, when a coach is hired based on gender, it's probably against the law.
The argument about gender and race is that a person with the same of those as the athletes in the program can relate better to them, thus giving them one positive attribute (or two) as a candidate for the job.
But then sometimes another candidate is so much more better they overcome that?
Too much in women’s basketball is decided by gender and/or race. (PH, I thought of officiating, too.) It’s a plus if a head coach can relate to her players better than a man. But even that plus may not be enough to outweight other attributes. Too many AD’s are weighing gender and race too heavily in the hiring process for head coaches, and too many head coaches are weighing them too much in the process of filling their staffs. It’s an issue - albeit a highly political one as BC mentioned - that the WBCA is just starting to finally put actions to their words. But it’s going to take some time.
My greater concern is that we have people with little/no coaching experience making decisions about who will be coaches. It used to be that AD’s were retired coaches. They hired and then properly mentored young coaches. Not anymore, especially at the D1 level. When presidents realized their best fundraising arm was athletics, they shifted to hiring fundraisers and bean counters and spreadsheet readers to be their athletic directors. But one of that position’s greatest responsibilities remains to hire/fire coaches. I often find myself asking what have many AD’s done that qualifies them for such a task?