JK37 wrote:Let’s make a deal: I’ll follow one when you make a good one.
Fair enough. I'll go slow.
1. If the committee ranked Alabama HIGHER than Georgia, then they expected Georgia to lose in a "head to head" matchup.
2. What was the result of the game? Should it cause the committee to re-evaluate? Was Georgia WORSE than expected? If so, move them down. Was Georgia AS expected? Leave them where they were. Was Georgia BETTER than expected, despite the loss? If so, move them up!
As I said in a previous post, I misremembered where the committee had ND. In any case, I disagreed with the committee on ND's ranking. The final four should have been: 1) Alabama 2) Clemson 3) Georgia 4) Oklahoma.
With your argument, you are forced to say that UCF should have have been in the final four simply because they were undefeated. Nonsense.