If you want to talk ASUN smack or ramble ad nauseum about your favorite pro or major college teams, this is the place to let it rip.

Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke

User avatar
By Sly Fox
Registration Days Posts
#482840
Asheville Citizen-Times wrote:UNC Asheville to pay selected athletes next season
Keith Jarrett, kjarrett@citizen-times.com 12:35 p.m. EDT April 25, 2015


ASHEVILLE – For colleges that rank at the bottom of their conferences in athletic budgets and struggle every year to break even financially, an extra $90,000 or so annually is a big expense.

But that's what UNC Asheville and probably Western Carolina are looking at spending to pay athletes and help keep up with their competitors.
Here's the meat of the story ...
The Big South Conference has decided that all 11 of its schools, including Asheville, will pay cost of attendance for all scholarship players on the men's and women's basketball teams.

Eaton and Appalachian State assistant AD Mike Flynn said their schools are undecided on how they will proceed.

According to UNC Asheville athletic director Janet Cone, the school's cost of attendance figure per athlete is $2,454 for in-state students and $3,564 for out-of-state, and paying the 27 basketball players expected to be on scholarship next season in those two sports will cost the school about $90,000 per year.
Click Here for Full Story
#482852
Cost of attendance is going to help some schools no matter how many sports are funded. Like Louisville, for example, will be paying kids $5000+ while UCLA is around $2500. If a recruit is deciding between those two, you don't think UL being able to legally give over twice as much isn't going to work heavily in their benefit?
By olldflame
Registration Days Posts
#482862
lynchburgwildcats wrote:Cost of attendance is going to help some schools no matter how many sports are funded. Like Louisville, for example, will be paying kids $5000+ while UCLA is around $2500. If a recruit is deciding between those two, you don't think UL being able to legally give over twice as much isn't going to work heavily in their benefit?
I'll admit the Louisville figure looks high when compared to some others, but they don't just pull those numbers out of the air. There are actual costs involved, and they are higher for some schools than others. You don't think the NCAA will be monitoring this?
By ATrain
Registration Days Posts
#482863
ballcoach15 wrote:Louisville is a rogue school. Look at who they hired for football and basketball coaches.
Louisville didn't hire Calipari :P
By olldflame
Registration Days Posts
#482870
Pitino and Petrino. Sounds like a Sicilian law firm. Fact is, although they have engaged in some questionable personal behavior, they both have been highly successful as college coaches and I don't think either has had significant problems with the NCAA. "Master of the Obvious", while it certainly applies, doesn't do justice to ballcoach. We need to come up with something else to cover statements like he made here about Louisville. He's the Judge Judy of FF. Makes up his mind about someone or something based on limited knowledge, and from then on won't be confused with the facts.
By TIMSCAR20
Registration Days Posts
#482878
Sly Fox wrote:If I am a 17-year-old choosing between UCLA & Louisville, there is an unfair advantage for one school that ha snothing to do with FCOA cash.
Very true Sly... In my opinion at the Major schools, few will have an extra advantage over the other based on this. The reason is because the "ancillary benefits" under the table will still go on and the schools that do those things will simply "offer more".
By ballcoach15
Registration Days Posts
#482884
There is more "under the table" stuff happening than most realize. When I was in the Army, a former PAC 10 basketball player was in my Platoon. He told me stories about his palm "getting greased" with 100 dollar bills. With the decisions some recruits make, it makes one wonder what all is taking place.
By olldflame
Registration Days Posts
#482889
Sly Fox wrote:If I am a 17-year-old choosing between UCLA & Louisville, there is an unfair advantage for one school that ha snothing to do with FCOA cash.
Like the 3 most important words in real estate?
By ATrain
Registration Days Posts
#482896
olldflame wrote:
Sly Fox wrote:If I am a 17-year-old choosing between UCLA & Louisville, there is an unfair advantage for one school that ha snothing to do with FCOA cash.
Like the 3 most important words in real estate?
Location, location, location...
By olldflame
Registration Days Posts
#482899
ATrain wrote:
olldflame wrote:
Sly Fox wrote:If I am a 17-year-old choosing between UCLA & Louisville, there is an unfair advantage for one school that ha snothing to do with FCOA cash.
Like the 3 most important words in real estate?
Location, location, location...
Yeah. Do I want to live in Los Angeles or Louisville? Even if you don't consider the weather, the cool factor for LA is like x10.
User avatar
By Purple Haize
Registration Days Posts
#482918
ballcoach15 wrote:I think very few recruits pick weather when selecting a school. If they did, northern teams would be bad.
I would take the Top 5 'warm weather' schools over the Top 5 'cold weather' schools. Except WVU. They transcend every type of weather!
#482923
Purple Haize wrote:
ballcoach15 wrote:I think very few recruits pick weather when selecting a school. If they did, northern teams would be bad.
I would take the Top 5 'warm weather' schools over the Top 5 'cold weather' schools. Except WVU. They transcend every type of weather!
Well you'd lose in basketball more often than you would win then.
By Humble_Opinion
Registration Days Posts
#482933
Purple Haize wrote:
ballcoach15 wrote:I think very few recruits pick weather when selecting a school. If they did, northern teams would be bad.
I would take the Top 5 'warm weather' schools over the Top 5 'cold weather' schools. Except WVU. They transcend every type of weather!
What are the top 5 for each?
By olldflame
Registration Days Posts
#482934
Humble_Opinion wrote:
Purple Haize wrote:
ballcoach15 wrote:I think very few recruits pick weather when selecting a school. If they did, northern teams would be bad.
I would take the Top 5 'warm weather' schools over the Top 5 'cold weather' schools. Except WVU. They transcend every type of weather!
What are the top 5 for each?
I'm not sure, but WVU wouldn't be on either list. 8)
By ATrain
Registration Days Posts
#482935
Yacht Rock wrote:I've lived in LA. Not all it's cracked up to be.
Yes, but the average high school kid doesn't.
By Humble_Opinion
Registration Days Posts
#482968
olldflame wrote:
Humble_Opinion wrote:
Purple Haize wrote: I would take the Top 5 'warm weather' schools over the Top 5 'cold weather' schools. Except WVU. They transcend every type of weather!
What are the top 5 for each?
I'm not sure, but WVU wouldn't be on either list. 8)
WVU would make the Top 5 for a list on Alcohol Consumption per Capita... who could blame them??? :lol:
By Humble_Opinion
Registration Days Posts
#483010
g-webb1994 wrote:Terrible idea for schools at our level that aren't a cash cow like you guys that are trying to just break even with their athletic budgets.
Are we a cash cow? Yeah I suppose... especially when compared to the rest of Higher Ed at the moment. However, NO athletics department in all of FCS truly "breaks even," including LU.
By thepostman
#483017
If you are struggling so much just to stay afloat in DI athletics maybe the school should rethink remaining DI. Too many schools are DI that have no business playing at that level anyways. Maybe this will help that problem.
HCJC

Where has Slyfox gone to?

UTEP

How many times has Vasko overthrown touchdowns wit[…]

2025 off season

Went to wrong topic! Supposed to be under Jamey […]

ODU

Good to see Bradford’s mom call out the […]