A Sea Of Red

March madness is in full effect as three sub 10 seeds won in the first two sessions and a fourth nearly eliminated a potential threat to Kentucky.

And now back into exile...

BJWilliams wrote:March madness is in full effect as three sub 10 seeds won in the first two sessions and a fourth nearly eliminated a potential threat to Kentucky.

And now back into exile...

If Notre Dame keeps playing pisss poor defense they might not make it past Saturday.

BJWilliams wrote:March madness is in full effect as three sub 10 seeds won in the first two sessions and a fourth nearly eliminated a potential threat to Kentucky.

And now back into exile...

Exiled?

Hope exile is treating you well bj

thepostman wrote:Hope exile is treating you well bj

It worked for
Napoleon
Lenin
DeGualle
Arafat

Purple Haize wrote:

thepostman wrote:Hope exile is treating you well bj

It worked for
Napoleon
Lenin
DeGualle
Arafat

John, author of Revelation

Clearly I was not aware of how bad Butler's offense is. I don't see how Bulldog fans can tolerate watching that garbage.

But how about that, yet another Villanova first weekend exit, six years in a row they have failed to get past the first weekend.

lynchburgwildcats wrote:Clearly I was not aware of how bad Butler's offense is. I don't see how Bulldog fans can tolerate watching that garbage.

But how about that, yet another Villanova first weekend exit, six years in a row they have failed to get past the first weekend.

And Georgetown went down too. What else do you expect out of the Big Least?

I hope Final 4 is Duke, UNC, NC State and West Va.

ATrain wrote:

lynchburgwildcats wrote:Clearly I was not aware of how bad Butler's offense is. I don't see how Bulldog fans can tolerate watching that garbage.

But how about that, yet another Villanova first weekend exit, six years in a row they have failed to get past the first weekend.

And Georgetown went down too. What else do you expect out of the Big Least?

Wow, ACC fans still bitter, even after realignment. Didn't realize the inferiority complex went that deep.

I do not recognize ACC realignment. In other words I do not acknowledge Notre Dame, Pittsburgh, Louisville and Syracuse being in ACC. Neither of these schools belong in ACC.

ballcoach15 wrote:I do not recognize ACC realignment. In other words I do not acknowledge Notre Dame, Pittsburgh, Louisville and Syracuse being in ACC. Neither of these schools belong in ACC.

Do you not recognize the NFL after the AFC-NFC merger? NBA-ABA? Leagues merge and sometimes expand. Get with the times or get left behind.

ballcoach15 wrote:I do not recognize ACC realignment. In other words I do not acknowledge Notre Dame, Pittsburgh, Louisville and Syracuse being in ACC. Neither of these schools belong in ACC.

Tell me, do you also refuse to acknowledge that the world is round and orbits the sun? Or are you still clinging to the belief that the earth is flat and is orbitted by the sun?

Conferences realign, accept it for what it is and move on.

ballcoach15 wrote:I do not recognize ACC realignment. In other words I do not acknowledge Notre Dame, Pittsburgh, Louisville and Syracuse being in ACC. Neither of these schools belong in ACC.

"Neither" implies "two." Which two schools do you not acknowledge? lol

Pitt, ND, Louisville nor Syracuse belong in ACC.

The ACC should have remained a southern based conference . yes put Boston College in with the other northern schools .

alabama24 wrote:

ballcoach15 wrote:I do not recognize ACC realignment. In other words I do not acknowledge Notre Dame, Pittsburgh, Louisville and Syracuse being in ACC. Neither of these schools belong in ACC.

"Neither" implies "two." Which two schools do you not acknowledge? I chortle audibly.

Nice job. Think he'll understand?

ballcoach15 wrote:Pitt, ND, Louisville nor Syracuse belong in ACC.

The ACC should have remained a southern based conference . yes put Boston College in with the other northern schools .

"Nor" implies "two." Which two schools do you not acknowledge? I chortle audibly.

Newsflash: Maryland is not in the South. Yet weren't they a founding member of the ACC? Do you not acknowledge their move to the B1G?

ATrain wrote:Newsflash: Maryland is not in the South. Yet weren't they a founding member of the ACC? Do you not acknowledge their move to the B1G?

Maryland is south of the Mason Dixon line. They are technically in the south.

So was West Virginia. But you'll have a hard time getting anyone from the Wild & Wonderful mountains to call themselves Southern.

When I was a kid and started following the ACC, I could never understand why a "northern school", (Maryland) was in ACC.

Doesn't the Atlantic Coast include the entire east coast of the United States including the northern states?

I get where you are coming from ballcoach but its the Atlantic Coast Conference, not the Southern Atlantic Coast Conference. Plenty of wiggle room provided with that name.

During the years of the BCS, many said Big East Conference did not deserve a spot in BCS Bowls. Then the ACC goes and invites half the Big East to join ACC, at a time when ACC football was struggling compared to other BCS conferences. Every school invited into ACC from Big East has issues, except probably Pittsburgh.
Louisville and Syracuse have ethical issues. Notre Dame is the NCAA's favorite child receiving treats that other schools do not get.

ballcoach15 wrote:During the years of the BCS, many said Big East Conference did not deserve a spot in BCS Bowls. Then the ACC goes and invites half the Big East to join ACC, at a time when ACC football was struggling compared to other BCS conferences. Every school invited into ACC from Big East has issues, except probably Pittsburgh.
Louisville and Syracuse have ethical issues. Notre Dame is the NCAA's favorite child receiving treats that other schools do not get.

You realize Carolina also has some issues, right, with those African-American Studies courses that didn't actually exist?

Also, the ACC did not invite half of the Big East, just three schools and one was to replace Maryland.

Sly Fox wrote:So was West Virginia. But you'll have a hard time getting anyone from the Wild & Wonderful mountains to call themselves Southern.

The preferred term is Appalachian - Americans

But not all southerners are Appalachian Americans and not all Appalachian Americans are southern.