Texas HS football stadium
Posted: August 10th, 2012, 8:20 pm


Some of you may have seen this before but I just saw this and it is insane! This seriously beats a lot of FCS stadiums. Unreal, everything is bigger in Texas apparently!
https://forums.aseaofred.com/forums/
https://forums.aseaofred.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=19506


thepostman wrote:Yeah I saw that and honestly in some aspects it is better then Williams...I agree, I would've loved to have seen this type of stadium here, no offense to Williams Stadium!
rogers3 wrote:What a waste of money.I thought the same thing, but apparently it went to a vote and the city approved, i wonder how good the school is academically
rogers3 wrote:What a waste of money.And if it generates revenue for the school? 18k seats with over 8k already reserved as season tickets is pretty amazing.
NotAJerry wrote:that gave a lot of insight into the stadium, its the taxpayers money and if they wanted to spend it on the stadium then let it be. i still cannot imagine a high school playing in a stadium like that!rogers3 wrote:What a waste of money.And if it generates revenue for the school? 18k seats with over 8k already reserved as season tickets is pretty amazing.
http://www.foxsportssouthwest.com/08/07 ... eedID=9236



bluedevilflame wrote:Still isn't right to force people to pay for things they may not want. If they go to the games, donate the money if they want a new stadium. I shouldn't be forced to subsidize any hobbies.NotAJerry wrote:that gave a lot of insight into the stadium, its the taxpayers money and if they wanted to spend it on the stadium then let it be. i still cannot imagine a high school playing in a stadium like that!rogers3 wrote:What a waste of money.And if it generates revenue for the school? 18k seats with over 8k already reserved as season tickets is pretty amazing.
http://www.foxsportssouthwest.com/08/07 ... eedID=9236
jbock13 wrote:Still a waste of money, and it won't generate enough to pay for itself, ever. Does the school district get all the proceeds? Oh well, there are plenty of boneheads out there who drive cars worth half the value of their house. This is the American way! What a great country!bluedevilflame wrote:Still isn't right to force people to pay for things they may not want. If they go to the games, donate the money if they want a new stadium. I shouldn't be forced to subsidize any hobbies.NotAJerry wrote: And if it generates revenue for the school? 18k seats with over 8k already reserved as season tickets is pretty amazing.that gave a lot of insight into the stadium, its the taxpayers money and if they wanted to spend it on the stadium then let it be. i still cannot imagine a high school playing in a stadium like that!
http://www.foxsportssouthwest.com/08/07 ... eedID=9236
I know everyone will hate me for saying that, but what else is new.
rogers3 wrote: Still a waste of money, and it won't generate enough to pay for itself, ever. Does the school district get all the proceeds? Oh well, there are plenty of boneheads out there who drive cars worth half the value of their house. This is the American way! What a great country!Your proof of that? It's easy to say a bunch of nonsense without the slightest bit of evidence for it. They field 4 football teams at that one high school. They've already sold over 8k in season tickets at $40/ticket for an immediate revenue of $320,000. There's another 10k seats in the place. Then there's vendor and parking revenue that will come in (this is Texas HS football). Throw in advertising that has already been sold on the scoreboard. Then there's the $10 price for the other 10k seats that allows for something close to another $500,000 in revenue from ticket sales alone. That's just varsity football and that's not including other events that may be held in the facility. I'm sure both JV squads, and likely even the Freshman squad, can charge (or ask for donations) a minimal amount.
The day after Allen plays its first game in Eagle Stadium, four smaller schools will play a double-header there. A college all-star game has booked the stadium next winter, and the district anticipates steady business renting the facility for football and soccer playoff games.I expect this kind of baseless response out of our two resident blowhards who often post for the sole purpose of being contrarian and stirring up arguments just to feel better about themselves. Don't be like them.
NotAJerry wrote:
I expect this kind of baseless response out of our two resident blowhards who often post for the sole purpose of being contrarian and stirring up arguments just to feel better about themselves. Don't be like them.
logic wrote:The "waste of money" concept is what keeps programs wallowing in FCS obscurity...let us never speak of those words around here again, as some of you probably think some things Liberty has done or will do are a "waste of money" as well.+1
logic wrote:The "waste of money" concept is what keeps programs wallowing in FCS obscurity...let us never speak of those words around here again, as some of you probably think some things Liberty has done or will do are a "waste of money" as well.Oh i can think of a lot of things done that are a waste of money.
NotAJerry wrote:Seriously? High school sports are not a profit center for any municipality, and municipal facilities both larger and smaller are known to be negative cash flow machines. A region never builds a facility to make money and rarely do they have expectations of a payoff in ticket sales and rental. The real income is derived from what people who attend spend outside of the facility. So that you don't blow a gasket and think that I have no idea what I'm talking about, why don't you do a little research and figure out why I would say such a God-awful thing. I'll help you out... this is just an example of what I mean; this civic center seats about 50% less than that football stadium, but it sees events sometimes multiple times a week for an entire year, and it doesn't make money. To top it off, I noted that the McAllen region was one of the poorest statistical areas in the US; sounds like there are bigger needs there, already. I'll stick with my opinion- I've had a "wet behind the ears" college grad call me a blowhard before, so...rogers3 wrote: Still a waste of money, and it won't generate enough to pay for itself, ever. Does the school district get all the proceeds? Oh well, there are plenty of boneheads out there who drive cars worth half the value of their house. This is the American way! What a great country!Your proof of that? It's easy to say a bunch of nonsense without the slightest bit of evidence for it. They field 4 football teams at that one high school. They've already sold over 8k in season tickets at $40/ticket for an immediate revenue of $320,000. There's another 10k seats in the place. Then there's vendor and parking revenue that will come in (this is Texas HS football). Throw in advertising that has already been sold on the scoreboard. Then there's the $10 price for the other 10k seats that allows for something close to another $500,000 in revenue from ticket sales alone. That's just varsity football and that's not including other events that may be held in the facility. I'm sure both JV squads, and likely even the Freshman squad, can charge (or ask for donations) a minimal amount.
Let's throw in band competitions for the 800 member band. Then there's the facilities built into the football facility to accommodate golf and wrestling. Maybe we can mention that they also built a $23.3 million auditorium for performing arts and $36.5 million transportation, maintenance and nutrition facility.
Finally, there's this tidbit that shows you clearly didn't read the article at all:
The day after Allen plays its first game in Eagle Stadium, four smaller schools will play a double-header there. A college all-star game has booked the stadium next winter, and the district anticipates steady business renting the facility for football and soccer playoff games.I expect this kind of baseless response out of our two resident blowhards who often post for the sole purpose of being contrarian and stirring up arguments just to feel better about themselves. Don't be like them.
rogers3 wrote:To top it off, I noted that the McAllen region was one of the poorest statistical areas in the US; sounds like there are bigger needs there, already. I'll stick with my opinion- I've had a "wet behind the ears" college grad call me a blowhard before, so...It's not the McAllen region. It's the Allen suburb in north Dallas.
"Civic centers in municipalities are traditionally not money-makers, but instead are quality-of-life services that are meant for the enjoyment of the public, who, in turn, spend their money and benefit the local economy," Smith said.