- May 17th, 2012, 11:14 am
#390934
Supposedly working on it now. Installing field turf & going for a different look.


Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.
Purple Haize wrote:I think I would have preferred the turf to be yellow. Black will be a nightmare. Although it is very slimingFunny, I've always associated sliming with the color GREEN.
bigsmooth wrote:Maryland should be focusing on playing better football than trying to make their field look "better" and their uniforms to "look" better.They want attention...and it's working.
LUnpretty11 wrote:PH, your BJ skills impress me.
adam42381 wrote:This ^^ Do you really think that there is any other reason for them changing to black turf than this? The fact that people are talking about it shows that its already having an effectbigsmooth wrote:Maryland should be focusing on playing better football than trying to make their field look "better" and their uniforms to "look" better.They want attention...and it's working.
ETLU wrote:I'm pretty I read somewhere that the NCAA outlawed the colorful turf thing...That's actually an internet legend. It's been talked about, but never actually banned.
The unique blue turf has spawned several myths. The most prevalent is that the NCAA subsequently banned playing surface colors other than green, but allowed Bronco Stadium's field to remain blue under a grandfather clause. In reality, the NCAA has never adopted such a rule. Any school may color its playing surface (or any part, mainly the end zones) any color it wishes. Indeed, other schools have non-green football fields including the University of New Haven (blue)[16] and Eastern Washington University (red). [17] On April 1, 2011, the University of Central Arkansas announced that they would install a purple and grey striped field to Estes Stadium.[18]