Page 1 of 2
Radford vs UNC
Posted: March 18th, 2009, 9:54 am
by ludad12
How many points will UNC win by?
Posted: March 18th, 2009, 10:22 am
by zdbecker
no lawson, they dont have an amazing D which will help Radford relax at the begining, I would say it stays within 10 the first 8-10 minutes, 15 point half time lead, they win by 22.
Posted: March 18th, 2009, 10:24 am
by Schfourteenteen
minus 2
Posted: March 18th, 2009, 11:25 am
by flameshaw
I hope Ratturd wins, but wouldn't want to bet on it.

Posted: March 18th, 2009, 11:37 am
by TylerBakersGonnaBGreat
If I were a gambling man...

I would say as of last night the spread was -26.5 UNC... Thats just a guess tho

Posted: March 18th, 2009, 1:52 pm
by scuzdriver
Sure would make a nice upset. Only if......
Re: Radford vs UNC
Posted: March 18th, 2009, 2:26 pm
by RagingTireFire
ludad12 wrote:How many points will UNC win by?
38
Posted: March 18th, 2009, 3:27 pm
by Maximus
UNC can't lose.. it would mess up my bracket. haha only joking
Re: Radford vs UNC
Posted: March 18th, 2009, 3:38 pm
by TylerBakersGonnaBGreat
ludad12 wrote:How many points will UNC win by?
27 I hope

Posted: March 18th, 2009, 3:44 pm
by Fumblerooskies
45
Posted: March 18th, 2009, 3:54 pm
by ALAFlamesFan
12
Posted: March 18th, 2009, 3:55 pm
by kel varson
No Lawson, so probably in the 15-25 point range. Hoping Radford can make it close. Should be interesting to see how Tyler and Art match up.
Posted: March 18th, 2009, 4:02 pm
by dompennix
non LU sports?
Posted: March 18th, 2009, 5:05 pm
by Cider Jim
When is the game? Will it be televised?
Posted: March 18th, 2009, 5:32 pm
by Fumblerooskies
Cider Jim wrote:When is the game? Will it be televised?
230 on Thursday...local on channel 7.
Posted: March 20th, 2009, 9:17 am
by paradox
It's great to go to the big dance, but it really says something when you lose by 50 or 60, like Radford and Chattanooga did. There's really nothing to build on when that happens.
Posted: March 20th, 2009, 10:06 am
by kingaling42
paradox wrote:It's great to go to the big dance, but it really says something when you lose by 50 or 60, like Radford and Chattanooga did. There's really nothing to build on when that happens.
Yep, real tough building on a regular season AND tournament championship season with 4 starters coming back... Stick to coffee early in the morning- the Kool-Aid's not good that early... I'm sure this one bad loss is going to hamper their confidence 8 months from now when they look at the banners in their place before playing a Big South opponent..
Posted: March 20th, 2009, 10:21 am
by SuperJon
He's the worst of everyone on here.
Posted: March 20th, 2009, 10:30 am
by paradox
kingaling42 wrote:paradox wrote:It's great to go to the big dance, but it really says something when you lose by 50 or 60, like Radford and Chattanooga did. There's really nothing to build on when that happens.
Yep, real tough building on a regular season AND tournament championship season with 4 starters coming back... Stick to coffee early in the morning- the Kool-Aid's not good that early... I'm sure this one bad loss is going to hamper their confidence 8 months from now when they look at the banners in their place before playing a Big South opponent..
So in your world, it's not even remotely possible for this game to be indicative of anything?
Forgive me if I'm not impressed with a team that gets blown out by 50 to a team that has been struggling without it's point gaurd and most potent backcourt player.
Posted: March 20th, 2009, 10:39 am
by RagingTireFire
paradox wrote:
So in your world, it's not even possible for this game to be indicative of anything?
It's indicative that one of the best teams in the country is vastly superior to a team from the Big South. That's pretty much it.
Posted: March 20th, 2009, 11:05 am
by paradox
Yea, but not being even remotely competitive, may possibly indicate that you may not be legit.
Also, keep in mind, UNC has been struggling lately without Ty Lawson in the lineup. If he's not back in round 2, they may be an early out as a one seed.
Posted: March 20th, 2009, 11:17 am
by kingaling42
paradox wrote:Yea, but not being even remotely competitive, may possibly indicate that you may not be legit.
Also, keep in mind UNC has been struggling lately without Ty Lawson in the lineup. If he's not back in round 2, they may be an early out as a one seed.
So by this same logic, LU's blow out loss to VMI since Jesse Sanders wasn't playing is what?? Some sign that LU is going to have trouble next year as well??
You act like this one loss for RU is some pre-cursor for doom NEXT year- that's quite a stretch.. RU is NOT legit compared to UNC- but you're choosing this
ONE GAME to reflect & superceed RU's
23 game results from this past Big South season??
That's not legit!!!
UNCA got absolutely smashed by UNC this year & we got beat by Ohio State, Tennessee, Duke & Buffalo- all really good teams, it didn't stop us from finishing 4th in the league & if you look at it really closely (& hypothetically), we blew 2 games to RU & our home game vs WU- those 3 wins in the regular season puts UNCA #1 in the tourney... It's not like getting beat by 60+ points at UNC ruined our year anymore than the early loss to UNCA ruined LU's season- why would it affect RU's season 8 months from now???
Posted: March 20th, 2009, 11:19 am
by ATrain
Posted: March 20th, 2009, 11:20 am
by paradox
kingaling42 wrote:paradox wrote:Yea, but not being even remotely competitive, may possibly indicate that you may not be legit.
Also, keep in mind UNC has been struggling lately without Ty Lawson in the lineup. If he's not back in round 2, they may be an early out as a one seed.
So by this same logic, LU's blow out loss to VMI since Jesse Sanders wasn't playing is what?? Some sign that LU is going to have trouble next year as well??
Why would it be? Jesse will be back next year. No Comprendo
....
Posted: March 20th, 2009, 11:34 am
by kingaling42
paradox wrote:kingaling42 wrote:paradox wrote:Yea, but not being even remotely competitive, may possibly indicate that you may not be legit.
Also, keep in mind UNC has been struggling lately without Ty Lawson in the lineup. If he's not back in round 2, they may be an early out as a one seed.
So by this same logic, LU's blow out loss to VMI since Jesse Sanders wasn't playing is what?? Some sign that LU is going to have trouble next year as well??
Why would it be? Jesse will be back next year. No Comprendo
....
GOOD!! You caught that!! I'm impressed that you can acknowledge how a bad situation should correct itself 8 months from now with no ill effects...