Page 1 of 1

BCS Bowl Games

Posted: December 8th, 2008, 12:25 pm
by HenryGale
Except for the National Championship game or a particular team you root for, do you have any desire to watch any of these bowl games? This may be the least exciting series of games since the inception of the BCS.

Posted: December 8th, 2008, 12:29 pm
by thepostman
to be perfectly honest, I haven't had a desire to watch even the BCS title game in 3 or 4 years...its just a joke to me

Posted: December 8th, 2008, 12:50 pm
by SumItUp
I had to actually look at the list of BCS games. Here they are with my picks. I'll probably only watch the Rose, Fiesta and Championship game. I might even miss those if my kids want to play Connect 4 or Scrabble.

January 1 Rose Bowl Penn State vs. USC (my pick – PSU)
January 1 Orange Bowl Virginia Tech vs. Cincinnati (my pick – VT)
January 2 Sugar Bowl Utah vs. Alabama (my pick – Bama)
January 5 Fiesta Bowl Texas vs. Ohio State (my pick – the Horns)
January 8 Championship Oklahoma vs. Florida (my pick – Boomer Sooner)

I have to admit that I did not realize there are now 34 bowl games. Whatever happened to New Year’s Day being a bowl bonanza. There are only 5 games on January 1st. If your team is not playing in a bowl game, they suck.

Posted: December 8th, 2008, 1:04 pm
by BJWilliams
Rose Bowl: USC
Orange Bowl: VT (They really need to play up though...Cincy is a surprisingly dangerous team offensively)
Sugar Bowl: Utah (I think that this wont end up like Hawaii-Georgia last year)
Fiesta Bowl: Texas (Texas is just too good right now and they are going to take their frustration about being screwed out of the NC game on the Buckeyes)
FedEx National Championship: Oklahoma 38-27

Posted: December 8th, 2008, 3:55 pm
by ATrain
Rose Bowl: USC overpowers Penn St.
Fiesta Bowl: After getting hammered by teams in the "defensive" SEC, Ohio State is going to get blown out of the water by Texas.
Orange Bowl: Cincy by a few, just b/c VT will choke again
Sugar Bowl: Alabama destroys Utah
Title Game: Finally facing some defense, Oklahoma falls to Florida in a close contest

Posted: December 8th, 2008, 4:28 pm
by DeathCab4LU
Rose Bowl: USC (amazing defense will stop PSU)
Orange Bowl: Cincinnati (don't sleep on them)
Sugar Bowl: Utah (call me crazy all you want....you heard it hear)
Fiesta Bowl: Texas (one word....Colt)
Championship: Florida (I'm not a Tebow fan but he is going to throttle the Sooners)

Posted: December 8th, 2008, 4:59 pm
by olldflame
DeathCab4LU wrote:Rose Bowl: USC (amazing defense will stop PSU)
Orange Bowl: Cincinnati (don't sleep on them)
Sugar Bowl: Utah (call me crazy all you want....you heard it hear)
Fiesta Bowl: Texas (one word....Colt)
Championship: Florida (I'm not a Tebow fan but he is going to throttle the Sooners)
I'd be interested to know not so much why you aren't a fan of Tim Tebow, but why you would make a point of saying so in this forum. To say that it is a minority view here is probably an understatement.

Posted: December 8th, 2008, 5:41 pm
by 4everfsu
My name will explain it for you :D

Posted: December 8th, 2008, 6:08 pm
by prototype
I agree - the games are weak this year. The championship game will be great, but beyond that - not impressed. I wish they would have paired Alabama vs. Texas / Boise State (who got ripped) vs. USC. / Texas Tech vs. Utah.

Posted: December 9th, 2008, 9:52 am
by nickrichards
Why did Boise get ripped? Other than the Oregon Ducks,their non conference schedule was horrible.

Posted: December 9th, 2008, 11:43 am
by Sly Fox
Nick you are sounding an awful lot like a CAA AD with that remark.

Posted: December 9th, 2008, 4:08 pm
by DeathCab4LU
olldflame wrote:
DeathCab4LU wrote:Rose Bowl: USC (amazing defense will stop PSU)
Orange Bowl: Cincinnati (don't sleep on them)
Sugar Bowl: Utah (call me crazy all you want....you heard it hear)
Fiesta Bowl: Texas (one word....Colt)
Championship: Florida (I'm not a Tebow fan but he is going to throttle the Sooners)
I'd be interested to know not so much why you aren't a fan of Tim Tebow, but why you would make a point of saying so in this forum. To say that it is a minority view here is probably an understatement.
Im just not a Tebow fan lol....I don't want to get into cause I know I am out numbered on this board :D

Posted: December 9th, 2008, 4:11 pm
by DeathCab4LU
prototype wrote:I agree - the games are weak this year. The championship game will be great, but beyond that - not impressed. I wish they would have paired Alabama vs. Texas / Boise State (who got ripped) vs. USC. / Texas Tech vs. Utah.
yea idk if Boise got ripped but Texas Tech deff did and I wish Graham Harrell would win the Heisman...he is nasty and is not a system quarterback

Image

+ Image

= Amazing! lol

Posted: December 9th, 2008, 4:21 pm
by Sly Fox
Kingsbury ... Symons ... Harrell. Explain the difference.

Posted: December 9th, 2008, 4:31 pm
by DeathCab4LU
Sly Fox wrote:Kingsbury ... Symons ... Harrell. Explain the difference.

Kliff Kingsbury

Image

Stats: 1,231 of 1,883 passes for 12,429 yards and 95 touchdowns and 40 interceptions

B.J. Symons

Image

Stats: 5,833 yards passing....and 52 TD passes

Graham Harrell

Image

Stats: 15,429 yards and 130 TD passes

As far as those three go Grahams stats speak for themselves

Posted: December 9th, 2008, 4:33 pm
by Sly Fox
Graham played significantly more games and none of the others had Crabtree. But my point is that the system creates the numbers.

Posted: December 9th, 2008, 4:36 pm
by DeathCab4LU
Sly Fox wrote:Graham played significantly more games and none of the others had Crabtree. But my point is that the system creates the numbers.
I understand that none of them had Crabtree but they did have good receivers and it is not fair to compare Harrell to Symons since he only played his senior season. Im just saying just because the system is good doesn't make him one of the best if not the best quarterback in the NCAA....lol im sry for hijacking this thread

Posted: December 9th, 2008, 4:41 pm
by flamesbball84
so because he has better stats that means he's not a product of the system? where's the logic in that?

Posted: December 9th, 2008, 4:46 pm
by DeathCab4LU
flamesbball84 wrote:so because he has better stats that means he's not a product of the system? where's the logic in that?
ok ok im sry I said anything lol I just think the stats show is not only a product of the system but yes I will say the system helped....lol im sry for bringing it up :D

Posted: December 9th, 2008, 8:22 pm
by ATrain
Sly Fox wrote:Nick you are sounding an awful lot like a CAA AD from UMass with that remark.
FTFY

Posted: December 17th, 2008, 11:39 am
by Sly Fox

Posted: December 17th, 2008, 12:24 pm
by Kolzilla41
Sly Fox wrote:Click Here
:lol:

Posted: December 17th, 2008, 2:28 pm
by RagingTireFire
Sly Fox wrote:Graham played significantly more games and none of the others had Crabtree. But my point is that the system creates the numbers.
Quoted for truth. Crabtree would be a far better Heisman candidate than Harrell and neither of them are as good as any of the three guys invited to the show.