- September 14th, 2012, 11:02 am
#403182
I think ND was wrong for accepting the ACC invite. Here is why -
I see football moving towards four, 16 team super-conferences.
I see the playoff teams coming from those conferences (Conference champions perhaps)
Right now I see the following as those four conferences, in no particular order -
1. SEC
2. Big Ten
3. PAC-12
4. Big-12
Sadly for the ACC I see them as the 5th man, on the outside and looking in. I don't think their performance over the past 12 years has made them a player on the scale of the other four conferences. Tech fans can disagree all they want but look at the past 12 years...look at rankings, look at bowl records. The four above mentioned conferences have no doubt been the strongest. The Big 12 looked unstable for a while but didn't lose much as far as far as firepower as West Virginia is ranked 9th and TCU 16th...well ahead of TAM and Mizzou. If anything they gained with the departures of those schools.
So imagine this situation -
You have the following conference champions, whether by a conference championship game or not, all with 1 or 2 losses, based on this week's current rankings -
PAC 12 - USC (2)
SEC - Alabama (1)
Big Ten - Michigan State (10)
Big 12 - Oklahoma (5)
ACC - Clemson - (11)
Now who do you think they will pick for the four play off teams? I don't think Clemson has a chance in that list. Heck I could even see a two loss LSU team being a better argument to make that playoff than a one loss Michigan State team.
A playoff this year might look like -
USC
Alabama
Oklahoma
LSU
With the Big Ten and ACC shut out of the party.
So why ND to the ACC? The Big Ten is better academically. ND is already in the Big Ten footprint. The Big Ten has much better football. Also, the Big Ten would have a better shot at having a playoff team than the ACC.
Just my two cents.