If you want to talk ASUN smack or ramble ad nauseum about your favorite pro or major college teams, this is the place to let it rip.

Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke

User avatar
By Fumblerooskies
Registration Days Posts
#180635
Purple Haize wrote:NBA Referee's get paid an annual salary. I want to say it starts at 140k a year, but it may ONLY be 125k. I agree with the concept of "Star" treatment and that happens at every level. A for instance: Player A1 goes in for a lay up. Player B2 and B8 make contact with him. Player B2 is the "star" of the team. A good official will call the foul on B8. Both players fouled A1 so you get to chose! I have no problem with that especially at the NBA level. As for the playoffs, I believe they get paid on a game by game basis. The same crew does not work the whole series. An individual may work more then one game in a series and more then one series, but won't work EVERY game in a series. The Great Donny Vaden worked his last game during one of the NBA finals. It was great to see him out there, but he only did that one game in the Finals.
This story could go either way: It could be the NBA's Steroid scandal or it could be nothing. IF Dungheap can name names and provide evidence, i.e. emails, memo's or recorded phone conversations, then this will be huge!! If not on the federal level, imagine what his book will bring in!! (Where's is Jose' Canseco's publisher!) Or if is a situation where the NBA reminded teh officials that people pay to see stars play, then you have nothing. IMHO, it is a tad too early to tell.
But they get those great perks like being able to sell their first class air tix and travel in coach instead...
..that's an easy 5K more a year. :roll:
User avatar
By flamesbball84
Registration Days Posts
#180636
Fumblerooskies wrote:
Purple Haize wrote:NBA Referee's get paid an annual salary. I want to say it starts at 140k a year, but it may ONLY be 125k. I agree with the concept of "Star" treatment and that happens at every level. A for instance: Player A1 goes in for a lay up. Player B2 and B8 make contact with him. Player B2 is the "star" of the team. A good official will call the foul on B8. Both players fouled A1 so you get to chose! I have no problem with that especially at the NBA level. As for the playoffs, I believe they get paid on a game by game basis. The same crew does not work the whole series. An individual may work more then one game in a series and more then one series, but won't work EVERY game in a series. The Great Donny Vaden worked his last game during one of the NBA finals. It was great to see him out there, but he only did that one game in the Finals.
This story could go either way: It could be the NBA's Steroid scandal or it could be nothing. IF Dungheap can name names and provide evidence, i.e. emails, memo's or recorded phone conversations, then this will be huge!! If not on the federal level, imagine what his book will bring in!! (Where's is Jose' Canseco's publisher!) Or if is a situation where the NBA reminded teh officials that people pay to see stars play, then you have nothing. IMHO, it is a tad too early to tell.
But they get those great perks like being able to sell their first class air tix and travel in coach instead...
..that's an easy 5K more a year. :roll:
no they dont. the government put a stop to that because the refs weren't reporting it as income like they were supposed to. now the refs aren't legally allowed to sell their tickets.
By kel varson
Registration Days Posts
#180637
The NBA was much more exciting this year but the playoffs have left a sour taste in my mouth. I just can't stand the disparity in officiating between home and away games. That isn't right.
User avatar
By WinthropEagleFan
Registration Days Posts
#180665
flamesbball84 wrote:
SuperJon wrote:
scuzdriver wrote:People pay to see the stars play, not the 10th guy off the bench. The refs have always left the star players alone. It's just the way it is.

I think the reason the popularity of the NBA is fading is much more than just the refs. It's the lack of the team concept, (one on one every time down the court gets real old). Also, it might just be me, but a large portion of the players look and act like thugs. Sorry, but who wants to watch that?
That's the NBA five years ago, not this year.
yep, except the cleveland cavaliers are still living in that time period. thank God they didnt go any further than they did because they are HORRIBLE for the nba.
They're far from being my favorite team, but what makes the Cavs so horrible for the NBA?
User avatar
By flamesbball84
Registration Days Posts
#180816
WinthropEagleFan wrote:
flamesbball84 wrote:
SuperJon wrote: That's the NBA five years ago, not this year.
yep, except the cleveland cavaliers are still living in that time period. thank God they didnt go any further than they did because they are HORRIBLE for the nba.
They're far from being my favorite team, but what makes the Cavs so horrible for the NBA?
they are they epitome of the type of offense that drove people away from the nba in the first place: one star who plays one-on-one for all 48 minutes. seriosuly, watch a game. virtually every single play is a clear out for him to take his opponent off the dribble. only reason that offense is even slightly effective is because LeBron is a good passer. however, their offense is by far one of the most fundamentally attrocious offenses in the nba today. you might as well just throw in an And1 dvd or vhs and watch that instead of a cavaliers game.
5 for 5 rule Meeting

Ohio just granted an injunction to 15 kids with mo[…]