If you want to talk ASUN smack or ramble ad nauseum about your favorite pro or major college teams, this is the place to let it rip.

Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke

User avatar
By NotAJerry
Registration Days Posts
#429015
Interesting that ESPN just ran the results of the first national poll on the name in 20 years and it's far more in favor of keeping the name than any of the local polls have been in recent years. 79% supported keeping the name, which is a pretty big margin but is still down 10% from the last national poll.
User avatar
By jbock13
Registration Days Posts
#429016
Not that anyone's ancestry makes their point any more or less relevant. That's another problem of today's modern society where only a certain group can have an opinion on an issue.
By 4everfsu
Registration Days Posts
#429024
jbock13 wrote:Not that anyone's ancestry makes their point any more or less relevant. That's another problem of today's modern society where only a certain group can have an opinion on an issue.
Only those with 1/32nd or more with native ancestry counts on the name change, etc.
User avatar
By adam42381
Registration Days Posts
#429026
jbock13 wrote:
adam42381 wrote:
jbock13 wrote:Okay, and crackers was at one time offensive, and today it's not. Words change. Definitions change. It's a fact of life.
I'm pretty sure the term cracker is still considered somewhat offensive except in Florida where it has a different meaning. Also, I don't know of any major sports teams called the Crackers.
Atlanta Black Crackers were a Negro League Team.
What year was that again?
User avatar
By adam42381
Registration Days Posts
#429028
The n-word was pervasive back then as well. Is that no longer offensive? At this point I'd imagine you'll say it isn't and people are race baiting by being offended by that word as well.
User avatar
By jbock13
Registration Days Posts
#429032
adam42381 wrote:The n-word was pervasive back then as well. Is that no longer offensive? At this point I'd imagine you'll say it isn't and people are race baiting by being offended by that word as well.
Considering that the word is used often amongst young blacks and whites today, yes, I would argue the word is no longer offensive.
By thepostman
#429034
jbock13 wrote:
adam42381 wrote:The n-word was pervasive back then as well. Is that no longer offensive? At this point I'd imagine you'll say it isn't and people are race baiting by being offended by that word as well.
Considering that the word is used often amongst young blacks and whites today, yes, I would argue the word is no longer offensive.
I agreed with you up until now....now you should stop
User avatar
By adam42381
Registration Days Posts
#429036
jbock13 wrote:
adam42381 wrote:The n-word was pervasive back then as well. Is that no longer offensive? At this point I'd imagine you'll say it isn't and people are race baiting by being offended by that word as well.
Considering that the word is used often amongst young blacks and whites today, yes, I would argue the word is no longer offensive.
It seems to me that you are actually racist and possibly don't even realize it. Wow.
User avatar
By jbock13
Registration Days Posts
#429040
How so? Just because you don't want have to an honest conversation that challenges popular groupthink? Nothing that I have just said can be disproven. We can disagree on the issues, that's fine, but it seems we're just avoiding the real root of the problem and just skirting around the edges.

For what it's worth, I didn't unload my honest opinion without thinking it wouldn't cause controversy. I just simply choose to say what I truly believe. Listen to any rap song today. If it's so offense today, why do they constantly refer to themselves in that manner? White people also do it too with their black friends. I often visit friends from my time lived in Roanoke City and know for a fact that they use such language across racial lines, without the context of bigotry and supremacy. Why? Because they're friends. They know each other. They believe in what race really is... the human race. They come from different ethincities, but they celebrate what makes us all happy: comradery and friendship.

Which leads me back to my original point: was it a slur at one time? Yes. Is it today? That's for everyone to come to their own conclusion. But be sure to challenge group-thought. Dare to explore new ideas, and formulate your own hypothesis.
Last edited by jbock13 on May 2nd, 2013, 9:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
By thepostman
#429043
regardless of who uses the n word it is a word that should not be used. White or black. Yes, words change in meaning, but the n word is still be used in a very, very negative way and those who make light of that should be ashamed of themselves.

So yes, I agree with you that words change in meaning over time, but I completely disagree with your view on the n word.
User avatar
By jbock13
Registration Days Posts
#429044
And that's fine, but I also believe the word is continuing to evolve. Personally I do not use it myself either. But, since I got trapped into a major distraction, my point about the term Redskin remains the same. I have shown that words do indeed evolve, regardless of origin.

I actually enjoy this conversation. Even though i know no one agrees with me. :lol:
User avatar
By adam42381
Registration Days Posts
#429045
On a similar note, kids use profanity constantly. Does that mean they're no longer offensive?

Disclaimer: I have no issue with so called curse words as they don't offend me personally.
User avatar
By jbock13
Registration Days Posts
#429047
adam42381 wrote:On a similar note, kids use profanity constantly. Does that mean they're no longer offensive?

Disclaimer: I have no issue with so called curse words as they don't offend me personally.
I think we're just going down a rabbit trail from this point. But here in lies the difference: you are personally offended. That's much different from someone claiming to represent a group of people who are supposedly all offended.
User avatar
By adam42381
Registration Days Posts
#429049
jbock13 wrote:
adam42381 wrote:On a similar note, kids use profanity constantly. Does that mean they're no longer offensive?

Disclaimer: I have no issue with so called curse words as they don't offend me personally.
I think we're just going down a rabbit trail from this point. But here in lies the difference: you are personally offended. That's much different from someone claiming to represent a group of people who are supposedly all offended.
I'm NOT personally offended. Groupthink says those words are offensive however.
User avatar
By jbock13
Registration Days Posts
#429050
adam42381 wrote:
jbock13 wrote:
adam42381 wrote:On a similar note, kids use profanity constantly. Does that mean they're no longer offensive?

Disclaimer: I have no issue with so called curse words as they don't offend me personally.
I think we're just going down a rabbit trail from this point. But here in lies the difference: you are personally offended. That's much different from someone claiming to represent a group of people who are supposedly all offended.
I'm NOT personally offended.
Oops, I read it as "unless they offend me personally." But either way, still, there's still a distinction between the choose. You choose not to be offended, and I say more power to you.
#429051
i don't have much patience for people who are offended by stuff that really has nothing to do with them. people love to unnecessarily inject themselves into issues that really affects their life not one bit. this pretty much is a perfect example.
User avatar
By adam42381
Registration Days Posts
#429054
RubberMallet wrote:i don't have much patience for people who are offended by stuff that really has nothing to do with them. people love to unnecessarily inject themselves into issues that really affects their life not one bit. this pretty much is a perfect example.
This and gay marriage, right? :lol:
#429060
not compatible. the statement i made is in regards to taking offense to text and wording. the gay marriage debate socio-economically impacts alot more than just 2 people. keeping your philly cheesesteak shop named "Chinks" does not.
#429103
jbock13 wrote:
adam42381 wrote:The n-word was pervasive back then as well. Is that no longer offensive? At this point I'd imagine you'll say it isn't and people are race baiting by being offended by that word as well.
Considering that the word is used often amongst young blacks and whites today, yes, I would argue the word is no longer offensive.
If you are anything but black/african-american, go to the really bad parts of downtow and start calling every black person you see the n-word and see how well that goes over. Might want to pack some heat with you before you go though...
Death?

Hello...

MBB CUSA Tournament

That was a stinging defeat. As bad as I feel thoug[…]

LU vs Sam Houston

Probably the biggest gripe I have with this year's[…]

LU vs LA Tech

It must be nice to be the only one able to post he[…]