- November 22nd, 2012, 1:27 pm
#412511
Since when have 1) coaches produced highly entertaining books and videos and 2) coaches pawning books and videos become a bad thing?
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
RubberMallet wrote:being somewhat near the area, i've heard of both colleges. more so the coach of grinnell who pretty much uses his coaching at grinnell as a stepping stone to promote his awful books about his stupid strategy of how to win basketball games.This. All of it.
this guy and his team is a 3 ring circus of stupid. they press to get the steal, if they get it they chuck up 3's with a few guys while the other 3 guys go for o-rebounds. if they get it, even if they are wide open for a 2 pt shot they chuck it out for the 3. and they just keep shooting them. usually only 1 guy on the floor is going to shoot. if the other team gets through the press they basically have an easy wide open shot.
it only works this well on rrrreally bad teams. fbc is like 200-300 students i think. i could probably enroll and walk on right now.
lynchburgwildcats wrote:He's been there 20+ years running the same thing. Define 'a few years"
There is a reason why schools that go to it abandon it after a few years. .
Purple Haize wrote:I meant schools other than Grinnell. No other school sticks with it because it consistently fails against good teams in tournaments. Only school that has run it that is apparently content with consistently losing in conference and NCAA Tournaments is Grinnell. Redlands, Emory & Henry, VMI, Puget Sound, Manhattanville, Greenville, and Muhlenberg women all use to run it and have abandoned it.lynchburgwildcats wrote:He's been there 20+ years running the same thing. Define 'a few years"
There is a reason why schools that go to it abandon it after a few years. .
He's sold a lot of books and videos
People are paying attention to his school
And none of it takes away from what the kid did
lynchburgwildcats wrote:They are the definition of a low D3. Always have and always will be with the system.So you're saying that Grinnell wouldn't stand a chance against a powerhouse D3 team like LC?
Cider Jim wrote:Not sure if they would beat LC or not, I don't know how good they will be this year and LC never plays the same teams as Grinnell given the geographic disparity. I can say LC did finish 5th in the ODAC last year - which is considered one of the top five conferences in D3 - meanwhile a great year at Grinnell would consist of them finishing runner up in a conference annually considered to be in the bottom half of D3, which consists of 43 conferences.lynchburgwildcats wrote:They are the definition of a low D3. Always have and always will be with the system.So you're saying that Grinnell wouldn't stand a chance against a powerhouse D3 team like LC?
Sly Fox wrote:It is indeed, CJ. There are anglicized Spanish names of communities up and down the Ohio River for some reason. Phoenix lives close to BYOON-uh VIST-uh. Then again, isn't that the name of the little town with the Mormon college on the way to Lexington on 501?Don't get me started. Byoonuh Vista, Ver-SAYLs, GallapolEEES .... (though they're starting to change the pronunciation of the last one, I think)
Purple Haize wrote:And still not taking anything away from what the kid accomplishedwhat takes away from it is that it's was against a team of seminary students who you me and three other schmoes could probably handle. like when you put up 30 against the old guys at the club. nevermind it was orchestrated by an idiot of a coach. hey let's absolutely murder this team of bunheads. but this time. only 1 guy take all the shots. it's a joke.
RubberMallet wrote:But you have to make the shots. Like I said earlier, take a look at the shot chart and try to accomplish the same thing. Then add a defender, because several of those shots they had a hand in his face. It's no more a shame then what LSU ran. The fact remains you have to make the shots, he did.Purple Haize wrote:And still not taking anything away from what the kid accomplishedwhat takes away from it is that it's was against a team of seminary students who you me and three other schmoes could probably handle. like when you put up 30 against the old guys at the club. nevermind it was orchestrated by an idiot of a coach. hey let's absolutely murder this team of bunheads. but this time. only 1 guy take all the shots. it's a joke.
Purple Haize wrote:Several. Like 10 out of the 108 he took. Most of those shots were the types of shots you get in an old man's YMCA league where the old people don't play defense because they might blow out their knee. Plus he was cherry picking nearly all game. That's intramural type garbage.RubberMallet wrote:But you have to make the shots. Like I said earlier, take a look at the shot chart and try to accomplish the same thing. Then add a defender, because several of those shots they had a hand in his face. It's no more a shame then what LSU ran. The fact remains you have to make the shots, he did.Purple Haize wrote:And still not taking anything away from what the kid accomplishedwhat takes away from it is that it's was against a team of seminary students who you me and three other schmoes could probably handle. like when you put up 30 against the old guys at the club. nevermind it was orchestrated by an idiot of a coach. hey let's absolutely murder this team of bunheads. but this time. only 1 guy take all the shots. it's a joke.
Purple Haize wrote:if he shoots 70% or over 50 % from beyond sure but he was under 50/40 or some crap. ho hum percentages. it was only a matter of taking a lot of shots, being the only guy taking those shots, and playing a team of corpses.RubberMallet wrote:But you have to make the shots. Like I said earlier, take a look at the shot chart and try to accomplish the same thing. Then add a defender, because several of those shots they had a hand in his face. It's no more a shame then what LSU ran. The fact remains you have to make the shots, he did.Purple Haize wrote:And still not taking anything away from what the kid accomplishedwhat takes away from it is that it's was against a team of seminary students who you me and three other schmoes could probably handle. like when you put up 30 against the old guys at the club. nevermind it was orchestrated by an idiot of a coach. hey let's absolutely murder this team of bunheads. but this time. only 1 guy take all the shots. it's a joke.
Purple Haize wrote:52-108the ole' you couldn't do it argument? really? this isn't some phenom kid having an extraordinary night. just a kid who shot alot and made an average amount shots against a ymca team.
27-71 from behind the arc. 38%. Not great but solid.
25-37 everywhere else.
He took the shots and made them. Are they playing a quality opponent? No. But it's also not just shooting around in an empty gym either. Again, go to the local Y and jack up 71 3 ptrs in 40 minutes. Or mix it up with a couple of 3's followed by a lay up and/or mid range jumper. Or pay a kid to put a hand up as you shoot those 71 3's. then get back to me with your percentage.
Purple Haize wrote:Did you watch the game?Yep, I'm jealous that my current employer, which is my #1 rooting interest in D3, is a vastly superior team now and historically than Grinnell. I'll gladly take my team winning games and being relevant in their own conference tournament over some dude scoring 138 points.
He still made them.
You are just jealous.
Purple Haize wrote:52-108That's you argument? Maybe you need to actually watch the game instead of just the propaganda machine highlight reel. Over half his shots weren't the least bit contested, glorified open gym shots. For a talented player, 38% from three isn't that hard against a poor high school JV squad which is basically what he played against.
27-71 from behind the arc. 38%. Not great but solid.
25-37 everywhere else.
He took the shots and made them. Are they playing a quality opponent? No. But it's also not just shooting around in an empty gym either. Again, go to the local Y and jack up 71 3 ptrs in 40 minutes. Or mix it up with a couple of 3's followed by a lay up and/or mid range jumper. Or pay a kid to put a hand up as you shoot those 71 3's. then get back to me with your percentage.
Cider Jim wrote:I guess my question is, how much difference is there between a top-tier D3 team and a D3 bottom dweller? I mean, they are all non-scholarship, right, so are they really that much better than an top intramural team at a DI school?I'm not sure if Faith Baptist is even a D3 or NAIA school. I THINK they are NCCAA, which is where we won out only National Champioship lol
Sly Fox wrote:Yes, Faith Baptist Bible College is a NCCAA Division II school. CJ understands what that means. They are on par with Tennessee Temple by classification.Don't forget Moody Bible was also in that classification !