- June 5th, 2013, 8:19 pm
#431624
My sources say that he's actually a portabella mushroom. Take from that what you will. I'm just passing it on.
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
flamehunter wrote:What does one have to do with the other, right Haize?I guess I do know a lot of outspoken drunks. Can't say I understand WHAT they are saying but they are usually pretty loud about it.
BuryYourDuke wrote:There ya go, that's the spirit!!oldjock wrote:Don't take Sims. I've heard from a good source that during the season he attended parties and sat in the corner getting drunk and smoking. It that is what it takes to be big time, no thanks.
Then you should find a nice NAIA Christian school to support, because we wouldn't have made it anywhere close to where we are without football players who party. Sorry, it's just the way it is.
Humble_Opinion wrote:Dakota -Humble-
Just so we're clear, I wasn't making the case for how VT screwed over Boone. I was merely agreeing with Smooth's comments that college coaches have to be weary of how they are perceived by high coaches in the treatment of past recruits. And I did that by providing the perception of Coach Morgan in regards to Greg Boone and VT. Whether that perception was accurate or not, doesn't matter to me or to the situation, as it is still an issue that can hurt the recruiting process from high school to college.
oldjock wrote:Don't take Sims. I've heard from a good source that during the season he attended parties and sat in the corner getting drunk and smoking. It that is what it takes to be big time, no thanks.This is stupid. Don't take Sims because he got drunk and smoked at parties? Like anyone on our football team hasn't sinned. Are we not supposed to be a school that seeks to change hearts for the Lord? I thought that was our goal? We don't need more Christians on this football team. If Sims parties, I would rather he come play at Liberty rather than if he went to Richmond or ODU. Instead of constantly thinking about what's best for Liberty, start thinking what's best for the kid. If he parties, what better school for him than Liberty? We're one of a handful of schools who discourage that behavior. If a player isn't a Christian, coming to Liberty MIGHT be the only chance he has to hear to gospel. Simply because a kid sinned at a previous school, is no reason to deny him a chance to change here.
VAGolf wrote:shock:oldjock wrote:Don't take Sims. I've heard from a good source that during the season he attended parties and sat in the corner getting drunk and smoking. It that is what it takes to be big time, no thanks.This is stupid. Don't take Sims because he got drunk and smoked at parties? Like anyone on our football team hasn't sinned. Are we not supposed to be a school that seeks to change hearts for the Lord? I thought that was our goal? We don't need more Christians on this football team. If Sims parties, I would rather he come play at Liberty rather than if he went to Richmond or ODU. Instead of constantly thinking about what's best for Liberty, start thinking what's best for the kid. If he parties, what better school for him than Liberty? We're one of a handful of schools who discourage that behavior. If a player isn't a Christian, coming to Liberty MIGHT be the only chance he has to hear to gospel. Simply because a kid sinned at a previous school, is no reason to deny him a chance to change here.
:
As far as football goes, I hope that Woodrum starts the season. Sims would without a doubt be one of the best players to wear a Liberty uniform. But Woodrum has worked hard for that starting job and had a very respectable Freshman season last year. I think you send a very negative message to the team if you let some transfer take over, when your current starter is solid. If Woodrum gets injured, and then Sims comes in and plays well, maybe you can give him the snaps.
Purple Haize wrote:No, my point was not that there is some ratio that we should seek to achieve or some non-Christian to Christian player quota we need to meet. My only point is that we should keep from being the University that turns kids away because of issues outside of the classroom or football field. On the flip side, we ought to be seeking kids who have had issues at other schools. Bring those kids in here and we'll change them. I'm confident in our leadership to have an effect on any kid that puts on a Liberty uniform. That doesn't necessarily mean we'll change every kid that plays for us. Or even that we'll change a majority of kids. I just can't stand it when people choose to look at a player's past, and determine that they aren't good enough for Liberty. That isn't who we are, and I pray to God that isn't what becomes of our athletic teams.VAGolf wrote:shock:oldjock wrote:Don't take Sims. I've heard from a good source that during the season he attended parties and sat in the corner getting drunk and smoking. It that is what it takes to be big time, no thanks.This is stupid. Don't take Sims because he got drunk and smoked at parties? Like anyone on our football team hasn't sinned. Are we not supposed to be a school that seeks to change hearts for the Lord? I thought that was our goal? We don't need more Christians on this football team. If Sims parties, I would rather he come play at Liberty rather than if he went to Richmond or ODU. Instead of constantly thinking about what's best for Liberty, start thinking what's best for the kid. If he parties, what better school for him than Liberty? We're one of a handful of schools who discourage that behavior. If a player isn't a Christian, coming to Liberty MIGHT be the only chance he has to hear to gospel. Simply because a kid sinned at a previous school, is no reason to deny him a chance to change here.
:
As far as football goes, I hope that Woodrum starts the season. Sims would without a doubt be one of the best players to wear a Liberty uniform. But Woodrum has worked hard for that starting job and had a very respectable Freshman season last year. I think you send a very negative message to the team if you let some transfer take over, when your current starter is solid. If Woodrum gets injured, and then Sims comes in and plays well, maybe you can give him the snaps.
I'm sorry? What? Is there a Christian to Non Christian ratio we should be looking at?
TH Spangler wrote:I trust coach Gills judgement. He knows the mission and the young men. He's also proven he will let you go, if you can't hack it on and off the field.+1
bigsmooth wrote:i do not see sour grapes at all. UVA wanted it to work with Sims or they would not have gone through that appeals process with the NCAA. like i said before, he has the talent, it is just will he step up. If so, he can be a beast. The players at UVA who cant cut it in class or are not good citizens are gone under London and he has removed several players because of that. As Haize said, I do trust Gill and his staff. as tight as he runs his program, i am sure Sims will know what is expected of him or he will not come here.I can Promise you No one See's sour grapes. I can also promise you that 99% of the children that post on here have absolutely no "SAY" in Liberty's Future...
jlread wrote: I can Promise you No one See's sour grapes. I can also promise you that 99% of the children that post on here have absolutely no "SAY" in Liberty's Future...
jlread wrote:I can Promise you No one See's sour grapes. I can also promise you that 99% of the children that post on here have absolutely no "SAY" in Liberty's Future...