jcmanson wrote:I also love how that article was titled "Bulls win Boozer sweepstakes"
Yeah they won it because they lost out on option #1 and #2 at PF and their biggest competitors (Miami and NYK) were out of the running after signing option #1 and #2 at PF.
Boozer is better than Stoudemire.
On offense, Stoudemire is a marginally better scorer but Boozer is the far superior passer. Stoudemire was 3rd among PFs in true scoring %, Boozer 6th. Boozer was one of the top passing PFs in the entire NBA last year, ranking 9th in assist ratio compared to 69th for Stoudemire, which is the second worst of all NBA PFs who qualified, only better than Serge Ibaka.
For rebounding, it's blowout in favor of Boozer. Boozer was 4th in rebound rate among PFs (9th in the entire league as well), Stoudemire 31st. PFs who rebounder at a better rate than Amare are such notable studs as Joe Smith, Shelden Williams, Jordan Hill, Amir Johnson, James Singleton, and Kris Humphries.
On defense, it's widely known that Amare is a pitiful defender that doesn't really care about playing any defense unless it's to block a shot. Boozer isn't all that great of a defender, but at least he tries.